Talk:Ilkley Moor UFO incident

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Ilkley Moor UFO incident is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Philip Spencer[edit]

Was trying to find this article, and looked up the name (Philip Spencer). Shouldn't it be a keyword for this article? If there isn't enough data on the man to actually create a page on him, then at least have him mentioned in the lists of people named Philip Spencer. 2001:1970:49A7:3000:ECC1:2957:4474:2C45 (talk) 03:56, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alien Photo?[edit]

The main evidence that this amazing event really happened is an actual photo of an actual space alien. Without that it would be nothing but some flaky nutjob spouting far-fetched wibble he obviously didn't think through properly (the aliens abducted him in order to show him a movie whose contents he can't reveal because the aliens don't want humans to know these terrible secrets?), and producing as proof a wonky compass he could have sabotaged in exactly the same way himself using some copper wire and a battery. The whole story stands or falls by how persuasive the photo is. So maybe it might be a good idea to, you know, include the photo in the article? Just a thought.

Oh, by the way, are you quite sure Nick Redfern is what Wikipedia defines as a reliable source? You wouldn't consider Timothy Green Beckley to be a reliable source of information about anything except the contents of books by Timothy Green Beckley, and the only real difference between him and Nick Redfern is that Nick's not dead. 86.132.249.222 (talk) 00:15, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]