Talk:Imperial Majesty Cruise Line

Criticisms?

The warning box in this article caught my attention. There are a number of references on the Internet to questionable business practices of organizations that may have "no legal connection to" this cruise line, but certainly seem to be in a business relationship with it. "Criticism" sections in Wikipedia articles are quite common. Does this article deserve one so that these criticisms can get a fair treatment? --Freeinfo (talk) 05:29, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

I'd say that if you can write a criticism section utilising sources that fill WP:Verifiability and write it in a dispassionate manner, go for it. I believe the warning box was put up due to constant additions of biased and completely unsourced additions. If there is a well-documented problem with the associates of the line, then it should at least be mentioned. Care should be taken so that the "criticism" does not overshadow the other contant of the article. — Kjet (talk · contribs) 11:08, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

shouldn't play games with facts- is there another Imperial Masesty Cruise line or not ? and why shouldn't their business practices not be associated with their operation ? if it is an issue then it deserved to be noted- not hidden under guise of legal diatribe. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.228.59.24 (talk) 21:55, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Imperial Majesty Cruise Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090219000000/http://www.maritimematters.com/shipnews.html to http://www.maritimematters.com/shipnews.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:31, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Imperial Majesty Cruise Line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120222134141/http://www.indiascrap.net/cgi-bin/rexview.cgi?rex=000242&wsc=60-0465&offset=0 to http://www.indiascrap.net/cgi-bin/rexview.cgi?rex=000242&wsc=60-0465&offset=0

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:15, 12 November 2017 (UTC)