Talk:Improbable (company)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Ghosts (Pac-Man) (8 participants)
Midnight.works (5 participants)
Revenge of the Killer Robots from Hell (3 participants)
Vette (Star Wars) (3 participants)
International Hobo (1 participant)
Wally Scharold (4 participants)
Cake Mania (series) (2 participants)
Do You Like Horny Bunnies? (17 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

ZX Spectrum (nom)
Squirtle (nom)
Slowpoke (Pokémon) (start)
Strago Magus (start)
Rayman (video game) (nom)
Setzer Gabbiani (start)
General Leo (start)
Game Boy Color (start)
Missile Command 3D (nom)
Harold Halibut (nom)
Talim (Soulcalibur) (start)
Fusajiro Yamauchi (start)
Mr. Mime (start)
Bella Goth (start)
Game Boy (nom)
Sonic Triple Trouble 16-Bit (nom)
Home Safety Hotline (nom)
Klefki (nom)
Sobble (start)
Exdeath (start)
Virtual Boy Wario Land (start)
Lucky Luna (nom)
Age of Empires: The Rise of Rome (start)
Mega Man X6 (start)
38 Studios (start)
Pikachu (start)
Reigns (video game) (start)
Shipment (Call of Duty) (start)
Fallout Online (start)

DYK nominations

Reviews and reassessments

The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask (nom)
Hogwarts Legacy (rev)
Pokémon Channel (nom)
Rain World (rev)
Noctule (band) (rev)
Mario Kart: Double Dash (nom)

Articles that need...

I've set this page on Improbable up and tried to maintain NPOV. However, given that I work for the company, I'm going to step away from it now, so others with no conflicts of interest can assess it properly.Grill (talk) 11:18, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Lots of press coverage in Bloomberg, FT - surely notable?[edit]

Per WP:ORGCRITE: "A company, is presumed notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in multiple reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject."

- Significant coverage - Improbable has been the *sole subject* of multiple profiles and new stories in global/national mass media. These headlines reference the subject: not just a passing mention. E.g. - Independent coverage in Bloomberg, Financial Times, The Times of London, and The Telegraph is enough, right? They're as reliable as any newspaper sources get.

There are a few self-published sources, but they were produced by subject matter experts. There are very few firms constructing the "plumbing" for the metaverse, therefore practically all experts on this topic are in-house by definition.

The papers are writing about Improbable for a mix of reasons:

a) The metaverse is getting lots of attention, and Improbable is arguably second only to Facebook/Meta in metaverse development, certsainly in term sof column inches in europe. Herman Narula is a leading metaverse expert (he gave a TED talk on gaming and virtual worlds, with 2m+ views; also regular media pundit on TV, BBC5, Sky and Bloomberg TV).

b) All investments by SoftBank and A16Z tend to receive global media attention. Softbank's investment in improbable was the largest ever in a European IT company. It's funded with £1bn (billion, not million) in investor money: that amount tends to draw coverage.

c) Soon after inception, Improbable was valued at £2bn, far higher than European startups. Since this outsized valuation, the firm and its founder have received a lot of headlines.

Improbable sells James-Bond-stuff to government/military, which generates media attention (esp now that hybrid warfare is on the agenda)

The breadth and depth of Improbable's coverage makes it a textbook-notable firm in my view, but if I'm missing something, let me know.--Oiona (talk) 08:12, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notability seems clear enough. But the article is something of a puff piece. Improbable has been associated with many failed games - Worlds Adrift, Nostos, etc. “He wants to change how games are made, but he hasn’t really made any games,” said Hilmar Veigar Petursson, chief executive of CCP Games, the maker of Eve Online, the space-based role-playing game."[1] (Financial Times paywall.)

They also lose money, after 10 years in business. [2]

Nothing in the article reflects that. John Nagle (talk) 20:48, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]