Talk:Inchmickery

	Scottish islands portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scottish Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands in Scotland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Scottish IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject Scottish IslandsTemplate:WikiProject Scottish IslandsScottish Islands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The concrete buildings were formed to make the island look (from a distance) like a battleship.[edit]

This sounds very doubtful, it looks a fairly standard Battery Control tower like many others. --jmb 00:35, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The concrete buildings make the island look (from a distance) like a battleship - that edit sounds better. --jmb 09:09, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It sounds as if they might have been intentionally made to look like a battleship during WWI - I was told that masts, rigging etc were erected to make the outline look like one specific ship. Must investigate further. --jmb 20:46, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Both Inchgarvie and Inchmickery could be mistaken for naval vessels from a distance IMHO. --MacRusgail 14:45, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is true, I have seen Inchgarvie but since i'm not usually granted that perspective of the forth I've not seen inchmickery but its likely to be true --86.153.2.246 00:42, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]