Talk:Independiente (Ricardo Arjona album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleIndependiente (Ricardo Arjona album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starIndependiente (Ricardo Arjona album) is the main article in the Independiente (Ricardo Arjona album) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 6, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
July 15, 2012Good article nomineeListed
August 4, 2012Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 7, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
November 1, 2012Featured article candidateNot promoted
December 8, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
July 19, 2013Good topic removal candidateKept
Current status: Good article

Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


I'm going to review this album to leave comments. This is not for GAN, but it should help out regardless.

Lead

  • References are not required in the lead as they are sourced in the body in the article.
    •  Done
  • Some information you listed in the lead are not mentioned in the body of the article such as the album reaching #1.
    •  Done
  • In general, the lead for this article does not adequately summarize the article well. I suggest you read WP:LEAD on how to write a lead section for an article.
    •  Done

Body article

  • Some key information for an album article are missing. For example, the commercial reception for album. How well did it do on the charts? How much it sell?
    • That information is not available. i've made and extensive research over the internet and all i've found is already on the article. =( --Hahc21 (talk) 00:51, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • I've re-structured the article. Now it contains such info.  Done
  • You mention a tour in the lead, but it should be summarize in the article as its own section.
    • I'll be adding the tour section then...
    •  Done
  • The music sample isn't working for me. I can help out if you're having trouble. Also, the sample exceeds the limit to how long it may be. Only 10% of the total song length may be used, in this case, no more than 24 seconds per WP:SAMPLE and it is more than 30 seconds.
    • Please help me! I knew that sample was over the limit... --Hahc21 (talk) 00:51, 8 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • See Wikipedia:WikiProject Albums/Album article style guide for more information on how an article for an album should be written. Erick (talk) 21:37, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination[edit]

I withdrew the nomination. 2 reasons:

  1. Ricardo Arjona is still promoting the album, so new information will arise.
  2. A major structure is needed. Thanks for reviewing the article and writing what needed to be done. =)
The article has improved quite significantly with your major edits. Nice job! I will get the sample fixed as soon as possible. EDIT: I see you got the samples fixed already, good job! I really like the picture you added on the tour section. I would still recommend the article getting peer reivewed as it will point you to the right direction and the article will have a better chance of getting GA. Erick (talk) 02:58, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks dude! I'll be requesting the peer review immediately. I owe you one XD --Hahc21 (talk) 17:20, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think the article is in good shape and TRM pretty much nailed everything in his peer review. The PR can be closed and it should be good to go for GA. Erick (talk) 17:05, 19 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Independiente (Ricardo Arjona album)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Status (talk · contribs) 19:50, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • This version included an album-only video at No.15 called "Independiente" --> This version includes an album-only video entitled "Independiente"
  • No --> number
  • On Canada and Spain --> In Canada and Spain... make sure this type of thing is fixed throughout the article.
  • Following, the tracklist of 'Independiente': --> Not needed
  • iTunes Bonus Track --> iTunes Store bonus track
  • Consistency between (Billboard) and US Billboard in charts section.
  • Sample of "Fuiste Tu Ricardo Arjona" needs to be reduced per sample guidelines.

Ok. I fixed all. Cheers! —Hahc21 20:19, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Translation problems[edit]

The original quotation on the Spanish page is «Dentro de la palabra "Independiente", incluso cuando suena a extrema libertad, hay una gran cantidad de compromiso y la responsabilidad de ser capaz de administrar, de la mejor manera posible, toda esa independencia.» The English for "compromiso" is "commitment", not "compromise". Please correct this (I do not edit because someone will revert automatically). It may be a good idea to check the quality of other translations on this page, since this is a pretty elementary error. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.13.205.244 (talk) 03:56, 15 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 23 external links on Independiente (Ricardo Arjona album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:00, 10 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]