Talk:Indian Psychiatric Society

This article is written in Indian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, analysed, defence) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Organizations Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India High‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article was last assessed in May 2012.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Talk about 'position paper'?[edit]

I've heard of documents floating around which suggest that the IPS was mulling plans about how to handle events such as NIMHANS's Nuke controversy and IPS President's speech remarks. I would like an insider to inform if it is true.59.93.193.90 (talk) 17:43, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's no use, the censors have won[edit]

The IPS is a bigger joke than the Indian Mujahideen these days:

1. "Pro-rapist" comments of Indira Sharma are directly equivalent to Mukesh Singh's, and are reported with approval in The Muslim Mirror. 2. People with known complaints of sexual harassment and homophobia against them are writing IPS-approved articles on "gender sensitivity" and domestic violence. 3. The unmodified ECT controversy - any mention of this is immediately deleted. 4. God help you if you piss off any IPS member - the end result is immediate rejection from any IPS journal without a peer review, even if your article is good enough to be accepted by an international journal with impact factors that the IPS can only fantasize about (true story; contact me for the details) 5. IPS wants to block any research into particular fields if their "favourite" authors are not involved (ditto) 6. IPS glorifies pornography and claims is it good for preventing rapes. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.241.47.87 (talk) 03:55, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In conclusion, I think Praveen Togadia is a great man compared to the buffoons of the IPS. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 115.241.47.87 (talk) 03:48, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]