Talk:Indian Village, Detroit

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Detroit task force.

National Register of Historic Places Mid‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

I grew up in the area, and while crime is a problem - as it is in all urban areas - it is not really central to what Indian Village is about or to its history. There is almost nothing here about the history of the Village or about the organizations that have kept the neighborhood together. That's a bit more important I think than jumping directly to crime and value comparisons with Grosse Pointe.

Please help expand the article, as you obviously have valuable perspective. That's what it's there for. But contributions need sources. See Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Verifiability. I would however disagree that crime isn't fairly important to Indian Village as a topic, but perhaps my perspective is skewed since I don't have that much experience with big cities. - Taxman ^Talk 23:54, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move, per discussion at Talk:Greektown, Detroit. -- tariqabjotu 06:31, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indian Village Historic District (Detroit, Michigan) → Indian Village, Detroit – While the official name of this district is Indian Village Historic District, the common name is undoubtedly Indian Village. Since there are more than one Indian Villages in existence, the Detroit qualification is necessary. Per WP:COMMONNAME, the name of this article should be Indian Village, Detroit. --Relisted. -- tariqabjotu 06:06, 29 June 2013 (UTC) Wikipedian77 (talk) 00:57, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose See my comments at Talk:Brush Park Historic District. I am opposing because this is one of many current, separate proposals to drop the words "Historic District" from Detroit article titles. Currently all historic districts in Detroit use the phrase, as shown at Category:Historic districts in Detroit, Michigan. I think instead of half-a-dozen unconnected individual discussions about whether to delete the phrase, there should be a discussion at some central location about whether or not to include the phrase "Historic District" for Detroit articles, and an overall consensus reached. I am neutral on what that consensus would be. --MelanieN (talk) 21:49, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Note: Please see consolidated discussion at Talk:Greektown Historic District. Thank you. Wikipedian77 (talk) 03:49, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Indian Village, Detroit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.detroit.k12.mi.us/schools/docs/school_boundaries_elementary.pdf
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.detroit.k12.mi.us/schools/docs/school_boundaries_middle.pdf
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.detroit.k12.mi.us/schools/docs/school_boundaries_high.pdf
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090313060229/http://www.mcgi.state.mi.us/hso/ to http://www.mcgi.state.mi.us/hso/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:59, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Indian Village, Detroit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:10, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]