Talk:Information continuity

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Concerning AfD - references[edit]

The concept of "Information continuity" seems to be one used in both medical care and in IT. This article captures the medical concept. In IT, it is related to business continuity. —ERcheck @ 15:19, 12 February 2006

Citations for medical usage:
- Joint Committee on Information Continuity, Kentucky Department for Mental Health and Mental Retardation.
- Quality of glaucoma care and services : Information, continuity of information and communication skills, Institute of Health Sciences and Public Health Research, University of Leeds, UK.
- Haggerty JL, Reid RJ, Freeman GK, Starfield BH, Adair CE, McKendry R (2003). "Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review". BMJ. 327 (7425): 1219–21. doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7425.1219. PMC 274066. PMID 14630762. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)

Note that in in the reference above, the section is named Informational continuity and

that searching for that string "Informational continuity" in PubMed gets 9 refs with 3 in the title. (3 review articles too)

Should the article be moved to that name?

RDBrown (talk) 17:19, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Citations for business context:
- Managing government information continuity, Public Sector Technology & Management, December 10, 2004.
- "Business Continuity = Information Continuity = Email Continuity; An Application-centric Approach to Disaster Recovery", Forbes.com, March 24, 2005.

AFD result - keep[edit]

This article was nominated for deletion on February 12, 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

Rob e rt 04:32, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]