Talk:Insect flight/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Dunkleosteus77 (talk · contribs) 13:19, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dunkleosteus77[edit]

  • Good idea, done.
  • Edited.
  • "dorsal longitudinal muscles" this isn't really a vocab word, it's just the muscles on the dorsal surface which run longitudinally (a good gloss would be "the muscles running across the back"), and "tergosternal" is just the muscle running from the tergum to the sternum   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  13:19, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edited both.
  • In Leading edge vortex, are all these debates fought by a bunch of people or do models just get periodically revised/superseded by a few people?   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  13:19, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • It seems that now the main mechanisms have been elucidated, they have remained stable.
Because it might be better to say "proposed by entomologist Harley Hudson" or something along those lines when introducing each hypothesis   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  22:37, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Added names and citations for different effects.
  • Removed.
  • I'm worried you didn't gloss enough fluid dynamics terms. Like "a Reynolds number that is typical of insect flight" you don't explain what a high or low number means or what's considered high or low, and what it typically is for insects is far removed   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  10:08, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Added gloss and ref. An idea of the range of values is given a little further on.
  • "viscous effects are much more important to the smaller insects, although the flow is still laminar, even in the largest fliers" if the R number is as high as 104, how can the flow still be laminar? Are you sure it's not 103?   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  10:08, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • The value is correct; edited the text.
  • "low Reynolds number flight" it'd be a lot easier to gloss Reynolds number and talk in terms of laminar and turbulent flow   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  10:08, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edited.
  • Fixed.
  • Removed, someone else's ORish accretions.
  • Fixed.
  • Done.
  • Fixed.
  • Removed the equation.
  • "They include wind tunnel experiments of a tethered locust and a tethered fly, and free hovering flight of a fruit fly" every experiment includes these?   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  10:08, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edited.
  • The first par of Hovering says it's a super complex process and then proceeds to just describe an insect fluttering its wing so fast that it doesn't fall. The entire thing is summed up in the last sentence   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  21:21, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edited.
  • "If the insect flaps its wings at a slow rate, the time interval during which the lifting force is zero is longer, and therefore the insect falls farther than if its wings were beating rapidly" worded more complicated than it actually is. Seems pretty obvious, the faster it flutters, the less it will fall   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  21:21, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edited.
  • Yes.
  • "After, the energy has to go somewhere" this implies a closed system. The energy was expended to create lift, that's why the insect needs to expend more energy to lift the wings again   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  21:21, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Rewritten.
  • Done several.
  • "the velocity varies sinusoidally along the wing path" could we replace "varies sinusoidally" with "oscillates"?   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  21:21, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Done, with gloss.
  • You don't have to do this, but I've only ever seen Young's elastic modulus denoted as E, so maybe you can refer to the potential energy using the more standard U   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  21:21, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Let's leave it for now.
  • "The stored energy in the two wings is 36 erg" you should clarify again here that this is for a bee-sized insect   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  21:21, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Done.
  • Done, clearly better.
  • Edited.
  • Simplified.

More[edit]

  • Moved the hoverfly to Hovering, indeed.
  • Added a fossil image.
  • Linked and glossed.
  • "The hypothesis with perhaps the strongest evidence is that which stems from the adaptation of endites and exites" you should start by saying "According to Trueman"   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  08:01, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Edited.
  • italicizing pod doesn't make it any less confusing.
  • Edited.
  • Done.
  • Removed the repetition.
  • You should be attributing all the hypotheses in Evolution because it sounds like this is just 1 or 2 people talking   User:Dunkleosteus77 |push to talk  08:01, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Done.

Dunkleosteus77 - All done to date? Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:23, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]