Talk:Interstate 295 (North Carolina)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Exit list[edit]

Let's not leave exit list like this. Use normal table formats even if most routes hasn't exist yet. In this case we don't need to color everything gray just because they hadn't yet exist.--Freewayguy What's up? 00:16, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I replaced the teal-bullet lists with a table. You might be aware when you edit, you have a blue toolbar on top of your editing channel, when you click on it, it lets you to automatically create a table. All the interchanges under construction I shaded it with light gray background.--Freewayguy What's up? 20:05, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just a Note[edit]

My recent edit summary says "It's NC 24 ''and" because I accidentally hit the Enter key before I finished typing. It should say "It's NC 24 and NC 87." Also, sorry if this isn't appropriate for article talk pages, since it's just a history summary correction.

Multi Trixes! (Talk - Me on Wikia) 22:15, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

NC 295?[edit]

The way I-295 is signed is with an interstate shield, but the "INTERSTATE" part is blank. Though the picture shows "FUTURE" in its place, it's signed with "FUTURE" banners above the shield, and not as NC 295. Is NC 295 the "secret" designation?

Multi Trixes! (Talk - Me on Wikia) 19:36, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have wrote the reason in the History of the article, NCDOT designated the future route as NC 295 in 2011 (ref included). Most recent NC state maps list the freeway as NC 295, even though on the ground it has "Future" I-295, which it still is. It is more or less a place holder and when they open the next section of the freeway this or next month we should see if they put-up NC 295 shields then or not. Eventually it will be Interstate 295, just not today; hope that helps. -WashuOtaku (talk) 21:32, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Too lazy to reference, but here it is[edit]

[1]

The edit was reversed because you were too lazy to correctly reference and make the correct changes to the page. Please do not relay on others to do the corrections for you. --WashuOtaku (talk) 04:21, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It was reverted the second time because you were calling me a liar. Looks like you revert other peoples' edits habitually for reasons. Reference it yourself, it's accurate. --Winged Brick (talk) 06:49, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]