Talk:Ipswich and Rosewood railway line

Australia: Queensland / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal Ipswich and Rosewood railway line is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The route diagram template for this article can be found in Template:Ipswich railway line.

Comments by SM247[edit]

Shouldn't this be Ipswich railway line, Brisbane consistent with the other suburban lines? The redirect should be reversed. SM247 10:36, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page has been moved for consistency with other suburban lines. --Arnzy ^{(whats up?)} 11:49, 13 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Corinda via South Brisbane railway line[edit]

Since TransLink has merged the lines in the timetables, the lines should be merged here too. -- d'oh! _[talk] 09:00, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would propose moving Rosewood railway line into here as well, and moving this page all-together to Ipswich-Rosewood railway line as both pretty much share the same timetables, operational schedules, etc. Sb617 (Talk) 10:22, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, ~~but if Rosewood is merged, than Nambour should also be merged into Caboolture~~. -- d'oh! _[talk] 10:28, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree with Nambour. Nambour and Gympie has separate timetables and schedules, not to mention TransLink and Queensland Rail brands it as Sunshine Coast Line. Whereas Ipswich and Rosewood have the same timetable and line. Sb617 (Talk) 10:37, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I take that back, you are right. -- d'oh! _[talk] 10:40, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Ipswich and Rosewood railway line. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:08, 16 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]