This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Irish slaves myth article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Folklore, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of the topics of folklore and folklore studies. If you would like to participate, you may edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project's page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion.FolkloreWikipedia:WikiProject FolkloreTemplate:WikiProject FolkloreFolklore articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative ViewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative ViewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative ViewsAlternative Views articles
You will need to be a lot more specific. I also recommend reading this talkpage and its archives before commenting.Acroterion(talk) 12:17, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Seconded, this is an extremely biased article on a complex topic. Just because the Irish slaves were allegedly not treated as badly as African slaves does not make it a "myth". I think the entire article needs a rewrite, beginning with the Title. Or at least cite some sources with opposing pov. --Jingle38 (talk) 04:55, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This is missing the point entirely. It's not about how the "Irish slaves" were treated as compared to African slaves, it's how chattel slavery in America is conflated with indentured servitude. For starters. This has been gone over many times, as the archives will attest - Alisontalk 19:00, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Slavery is slavery it's disgusting that you're trying to compare the two and invalidate grievances that non-Africans might also have. Disgraceful Dan27032 (talk) 15:10, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Slavery is slavery, and indentured servitude isn't it. I suggest reading the article. BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 15:17, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Many of these "indentured servants" had the terms and conditions of their indenture constantly altered with additional cost's such as food, water, clothing and living accommodation tacked onto the terms extending the length of their service by years and in some case's for life, as life in the colonies was generally nasty & short. They where slaves in all but name and this entire article is utter drivel ignoring well known historic facts sacrificing them on the alter of modern politics.
The article should be removed or at the very least edited to be impartial.
It does not appear like you have bothered to read anything. If you think coverage of Irish indentured servitude needs improvement go to that article and discuss it there. This is just not the place to disappear other information, because you don't like what sources say, we are not here to write down (or not write down) things based on what you want to think about. Alanscottwalker (talk) 17:18, 26 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Alan, I was responding to the comments specifically not the article though it also mentions "indentured servants" I was clarifying how indentured servitude smells an awful lot like slavery to me and most likely to be people who sufferer through it.
What it smells like to you is just not relevant on this page, but factoids may also be turned to pseudo-history when shorn of specificity, context, and employed as rhetoric. Alanscottwalker (talk) 14:13, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Alan,
By that logic your opinion on it's relevance doesn't matter either. It's not pseudo-history just history, every race and nation where slaves at one point either in antiquity or more recently it doesn't detract from it just because a bit of time has passed. Countless civilizations have tried to justify their actions by calling it various things (when they had a mind to of course) the fact still remains a slave is still a slave whether it's for a day or for life whether it's today or 10,000 years ago (you forget that slaves in Rome were often freed after a length service or the death of an owner so by the logic of this article they were "indentured servants and they were just helping to colonize Rome on behalf of the Gauls, Britons, Thracians etc" - obviously they weren't they were slaves.) This article reeks of revisionism to suit a modern political agenda, Wikipedia is supposed to be an encyclopedia not a political blog all articles are to be written according to Wikipedia:Neutral point of view standards this one clearly is not there is no point arguing it is clearly in breach of how the articles are to written. Shifting from a centralist rational point of view alienates many and leads the site into irrelevance and eventually obscurity. It doesn't matter how either of us feel about it the article doesn't meet the standards of NPOV, so no point arguing with me I just thought I'd throw in my two cent's because I'm sick of seeing articles like this written with such a bias (left or right) sowing further division.
No. NPOV is not false balance, nor false equivalency. Just read the sources. Indeed, "slave" can be used in a variety of ways, for example in the phrase, "slaves to a myth", by one of the Irish professors in the sources, it is just that in the pseudo-history documented in this Wikipedia article, it is used for a rhetoric of conflation and false equivalence. --Alanscottwalker (talk) 21:05, 1 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
All of the articles I’ve read on Irish Slavery seem to only be able to dispute that the Irish weren’t the “first” slaves or that they were “Indentured Servants”. Which, as we all know, was tantamount to slavery itself. There were no regulations or consequences for how the Irish were treated or what types of labors were allowed. They were sold, they were shipped and they were used like any other slave of the time. Many profited from their sale. Many except for themselves. So, if you say that that the claim of the Irish being slaves is “false” because they weren’t the “first” slaves as the meme says or they were actually “indentured servants”… you are part of the problem in regards to the history and plight of the Irish in the 17th century. The1Kraken (talk) 03:55, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Well indentured servitude was in no way limited to the Irish, indeed by numbers there were probably more English or Welsh or Scottish or German. And, no the Irish were not first, nor the first apprentices, nor child laborers, nor work-house debt workers, nor unpaid women's work, etc. all these unfair systems inflicted across nations of poor people. But you are missing the point entirely, they were still not in hereditary chattel slavery, generation upon generation. Alanscottwalker (talk) 21:53, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
You're missing the point entirely. A comparison to chattel slavery is not assumed when looking at the Irish experience. The article title is factually incorrect and it assumes an argument that only you are making. Reduce it to the core issue: irish slavery and servitude. The article should then discuss the degrees and conditions faced by the Irish. Irish people exist as more than just a tool by which to measure other people's pain. 2601:601:8581:2E20:ECB8:129B:EAA:E6B (talk) 04:01, 12 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
"Irish people exist as more than just a tool by which to measure other people's pain." Article dismisses evidence for irish slavery with opinion. 70.40.80.40 (talk) 22:13, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to read the 56 references. Acroterion(talk) 22:34, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
