Talk:It Takes Two (1995 film)

Fair use rationale for Image:Mk&a.jpg

Image:Mk&a.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:28, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Infobox

After editing the infobox to reflect the order of actors as shown on the promotional poster, Montana's Defender (talk · contribs) reverted me with no explanation. I think this issue is a fairly straightforward one, but would welcome input from other editors as to which order is the appropriate one to be used. — Manticore 14:03, 14 November 2009 (UTC)

WP:OR

MightyDinoPower15 has repeatedly added "Many of the plot points are taken from Mark Twain's story 'The Prince and the Pauper'." While this is possibly true, it is original research: we do not have a source for it. Instead, we have an editor who has apparently seen the movie, knows the plot of Twain's book and feels there is a resemblance.

Yeah, two lookalike characters switch places and hilarity ensures. While this happens in "It Takes Two" (apparently, as I haven't seen it) and "The Prince and the Pauper", it also happens in the original German novel the first film seems to be based on, other kids' books and films (e.g., "Freaky Friday"), Dickens, Shakespeare, an episode of "The Brady Bunch" and -- probably -- episodes of "The Simpsons", "Futurama" and dozens of others. Why call out the Twain book? - SummerPhD^v2.0 02:22, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on It Takes Two (1995 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/5ww3Rptra?url=http://www.youngartistawards.org/pastnoms17.htm to http://www.youngartistawards.org/pastnoms17.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:54, 17 November 2017 (UTC)

Socking

This article is a recurring target of the underwear/humiliation obsessed User:Johnlewisskirt. Please see the associated sock case for more info. - SummerPhD^v2.0 05:18, 31 December 2018 (UTC)

Lottie and Lisa

In the past it was mentioned in the article that the movie is based on "Lottie and Lisa" by Erich Kästner, even if it is loosely based on it. References are also in the German, french, russian etc. articles of this movie in Wikipedia. In 2010 someone with an IP claimed to be the writer of the movie and removed the reference with quote: "I wrote "It Takes Two" and I have never read a book called "Lottie and Lisa" so I am quite sure that my film wasn't based on said book. So, I took out the reference." However it is very likely that the person saw "The Parents Trap" and based his story on it and the Parents Trap is actually based on "Lottie and Lisa". So there is a connection between "It Takes Two" and "Lottie and Lisa". Shouldn't it be mentioned in the article? --2003:E4:BF2A:92E3:FD7E:FE10:B666:E353 (talk) 14:47, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

I have no clue whether or not that anonymous IP had anything to do with the film or not.

That said, if this film is based on another film that is based on a novel, there is a connection, though this film is not necessarily "based on" the novel.

To discuss the connection -- whatever that connection may be -- we need an independent reliable source discussing that connection. That wikis in other languages make a connection is immaterial. Wikis are not reliable sources. If, however, those wikis cite sources, you are certainly free to assess whether or not they are reliable sources and, if so, use them directly. - SummerPhD^v2.0 16:31, 13 April 2020 (UTC)

Many links I found, mostly German links, where the movie ist called "Eins und eins macht vier" (one and one makes four), mostly refer to this movie as "'Das doppelte Lottchen'(the original title of the book) new interpreted", including in this trailer from the Disney Channel: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Og6LbzYwVo

The austrian site Film.AT names it "Das doppelte Lottchen with the Olsen twins": https://www.film.at/eins_und_eins_macht_vier

Media critic site Quotenmeter calls it a remake of "Das doppelte Lottchen" (at the day it was broadcasted this year it was better than Doctor Who, according to this article): http://www.quotenmeter.de/n/114865/olsen-twins-stechen-den-doctor-aus

Here is a blog about the original novel and its adaptation, it has an interesting list of adaptations of Kästner's novel: https://thenovelee.blogspot.com/2019/07/the-german-novel-that-inspired-disneys.html It says here: "There are 23 total adaptations of Das doppelte Lottchen, including the two Parent Traps, and the very loose adaptation It Takes Two (1995) starring the Olsen twins (for a total of 3 American versions)"

German critic Richart Oehmann calls it "Das doppelte Lottchen from Hollywood" and wrote: "Erich Kästner ... surely wouldn't be insulted that he wasn't even credited", criticizing the "social kitsch" of themovie https://www.artechock.de/film/text/kritik/1/1und1.htm

And finally an analysis from two twins watching this movie, calling it "Mary-Kate and and Ashley’s knockoff Parent Trap (1961), It Takes Two": https://www.buzzfeed.com/connieesch/twins-rewatch-mary-kate-ashley-it-takes-two

Maybe this helps. At least it can be referenced that it is related to at least the movie adapation. --2003:E4:BF2A:9221:8DFE:CAC4:5ACC:627E (talk) 16:02, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Since there are no objections, this will be added. Hope it is OK. Thank you. 2003:E4:BF19:1587:D4A1:F7C1:95A8:8BF5 (talk) 23:48, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

The Prince and the Pauper (1881) is based on Lottie and Lisa (1949)???

How? That doesn’t make any sense, chronologically. I could see “is the basis for,” but that would have to be supported by citations that I don’t have.

I see there’s been much deliberation in Talk and in the edits over just what inspired what — Parent Trap, Lottie and Lisa, Prince and the Pauper. In fact, it looks like that sentence originally said “is similar to The Parent Trap, which in turn is based on Lottie and Lisa,” (which makes sense) and somehow it all got jumbled up when someone tried to throw Prince & Pauper into the mix. I don’t want to just nix any reference to Prince & Pauper if that really is a relevant connection, but it shouldn’t read as it currently does. 75.128.112.164 (talk) 05:32, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

I've deleted it from the lead section.

As similar discussion above already say, if there is a connection, it should be described in the article with a reference to another reliable source that discusses it. Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 10:15, 2 July 2023 (UTC)