Talk:Italy–Yugoslavia relations

Italy High‑importance

	Italy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Yugoslavia High‑importance

	Italy–Yugoslavia relations is within the scope of WikiProject Yugoslavia, a collaborative effort to improve the Wikipedia coverage of articles related to Yugoslavia and its nations. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.YugoslaviaWikipedia:WikiProject YugoslaviaTemplate:WikiProject YugoslaviaYugoslavia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rjecina, I've got an idea - how about including even further? You know NDH had territorial disputes with Italy. And so did even Communist Yugo.--PaxEquilibrium (talk) 09:38, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK but my sources are speaking only about relationship between two kingdoms. I will add sources in next hour. --Rjecina (talk) 09:51, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gobbledegook[edit]

I have not copyedited para 2 of the 'Later years' section because (a) I wanted to leave an 'original' piece of the article, (b) I didn't want to change the meaning and (c) I didn't understand it !
To wit: "On France demands Kingdom of Yugoslavia has not started diplomatic actions before League of Nations..."

RASAM (talk) 17:05, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The missing word[edit]

" because of the lasting _______ over the city-port of Fiume"; this phrase appears in 'The issue of Fiume' section.
I would say that it requires some sort of adjective between "lasting" and "over"; I am reluctant to add one as it might change the meaning of the sentence. So, has anyone got the relevant information?
RASAM (talk) 21:25, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I guess dispute would fit in the space. I'm going to rephrase it.--Dans (talk) 01:17, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Italy–Yugoslavia relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:45, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Invasion of Yugoslavia lines of attack Why We Fight no. 5.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 12:52, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]