Talk:James C. Scott

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

Why was this talk page deleted? And Does James C. Scott really raise sheep or is that a hack?

UW oral history[edit]

There's a nice oral history (+ transcript) with Scott in the UW–Madison University Archives, if you're interested czar 16:40, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on James C. Scott. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:37, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welsh patronymic example in 'Seeing Like a State' section[edit]

I changed one sentence. For context, the preceding sentence is: "In the case of last names, Scott cites a Welsh man who appeared in court and identified himself with a long string of patronyms: "John, ap Thomas ap William" etc."

The prior version of the changed sentence is: "In his local village, this naming system carried a lot of information, because people could identify him as the son of Thomas and grandson of William, and thus distinguish him from the other Johns and the other grandchildren of Thomas."

The new version of the changed sentence is: "In his local village, this naming system carried a lot of information, because people could identify him as the son of Thomas and grandson of William, and thus distinguish him from the other Johns, the other children of Thomas, and the other grandchildren of William."

There is an error in the prior version, as John is Thomas's son, not grandson. But is the new version correct with nothing superfluous? Gvros8 (talk) 21:00, 15 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Scott wrote two different books on anarchist theory, why is he associated with libertarian-ism[edit]

Can this be changed to the anarchism tab to better reflect his actual view points and work? 220.233.178.107 (talk) 04:03, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed this as well today 3 months after this comment. I wish someone would change it; I don't know how Mbarcy (talk) 09:03, 16 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know how to either but I suggest someone do it bc it's a bit annoying. If no one does it I guess I'll try doing it later. scapegoat (talk) 15:54, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]