Talk:James New York – NoMad

James New York – NoMad has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: February 1, 2024. (Reviewed version).

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York City Mid‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Historic sites Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hotels Low‑importance

	Hotels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hotels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to the hospitality industry, including hotels, motels, resorts, and destination spas on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HotelsWikipedia:WikiProject HotelsTemplate:WikiProject HotelsHotels articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from James New York – NoMad appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 8 August 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the James New York – NoMad hotel employed a witch?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/August. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/James New York – NoMad.

Wikipedia

Article's name[edit]

According to our guidelines, the article's name needs to be changed if a new name of the hotel is to be bolded at the head of the lead of this article. Unless that's done, I'll be reverting this again. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 09:50, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

As per WP:NAMECHANGES "we give extra weight to reliable sources written after the name change is announced." Sources should show this. I can only see one which is the hotel's own page. I would suggest creating a redirect to the new nam until there are some reliable sources that use this new name and then make the page move. --Dom from Paris (talk) 11:12, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Bruxton (talk) 03:26, 1 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

The James New York – NoMad hotel

... that the James New York – NoMad hotel employed a witch? Source: Meltzer, Marisa (October 22, 2019). "Interview With the Witch". The New York Times.
- ALT1: ... that a pair of houses next to the Seville Hotel were characterized as a "big factor to the financial success of the hotel" merely for existing? Source: "Real Estate Market News and Comment". The Sun. July 15, 1913. p. 13. "Real Estate Market News and Comment". The Sun. July 15, 1913. p. 13.
- ALT2: ... that a guest suite at New York City's Carlton Hotel had a bar and poker table hidden behind a bookcase? Source: Sheftell, Jason (February 7, 2013). "The Carlton Hotel in midtown offers fantasy fun connected to New York's past". New York Daily News.
- ALT3: ... that before a stained-glass dome in New York City's Carlton Hotel was renovated in the 2000s, no one realized that the dome existed? Source: Amatulli, Jodi (September 24, 2006). "Exploring the Past on Madison Avenue; Carlton Hotel Returns to Original 1900s Opulence". New Haven Register. p. E8.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Theo Baker

5x expanded by Epicgenius (talk). Self-nominated at 18:46, 28 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/James New York – NoMad; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
Freely licensed: Used in article: Clear at 100px:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: I take "in residence" from the orignal hook's source to mean the same as employed, even if only for a month. All hooks are OK; I think the original is the most compelling but happy for the powers that be to select another. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 23:15, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

Passed. Bruxton (talk) 03:26, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:James New York – NoMad/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Bruxton (talk · contribs) 17:54, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Review[edit]

I am happy to review this article.

The article is comprehensive and has 4,900 words. I love that each fact presented in the lead summary, is repeated and cited in the body (I checked them)

Need synonyms for "contain" - right now 27 occurrences. Also 28 occurrences of Design or designed. Might just see if any other synonyms can be used.

Done

I do not find evidence of plagiarism and my spot checks of citations do not reveal issues.

The article complies with MOS:ORDER and it has an infobox with relevant information.

The images are terrific and since the US enjoys FOP for buildings they are licensed properly

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	Yes
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Yes
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	Yes
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Yes
	2c. it contains no original research.	Yes
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	Yes
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	Yes
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	Yes
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	Yes
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	Yes
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Yes
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Yes
	7. Overall assessment.

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.