Talk:Jamie xx

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Reference[edit]

http://sinastetica.blogspot.com.es/2015/11/jamie-xx-sintesis-aditiva.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.23.27.221 (talk) 10:08, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Significant Coverage?[edit]

This artist seems to lack Significant Coverage according to WP:SIGCOV and should be considered for speedy deletion. The article and the first 4 cites are all about the band with very little mention at all about the artist. The last section speaks more of the artist producing music. I'm not a pro at this, but it still seems less that significant coverage standards. There is nothing civil about Civil War.Let's Talk! 07:59, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This page should not be speedy deleted because...[edit]

This page should not be speedily deleted because Jamie xx is a notable and innovative music producer who is shaping the electronic music of the last couple of years, both as solo act and as part of his band The xx he is composing and remixing many tracks, expanding the dimensions of the electronic music sound and being one of the most important contributors to the emerging post-dubstep genre. Jamie xx is being celebrated by many well known and established music journalists, critics and fellow DJ's from media like the BBC, BBC Radio 1, the Guardian, Fact Magazine, Mixmag, Boiler Room, Carhartt and many others. His single "Far Nearer" was selected Best New Track by the Pitchfork music site on June 6, 2011 --Goschko (talk) 01:04, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 23 February 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus to move. (non-admin closure) — Amakuru (talk) 10:40, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

– "xx" is just how the names are styled. The "XX" in their names should technically be capitalized. I apologize if there are any other articles that have lower-case "xx" that I forgot to add, but if so, this request goes for them too. 2601:8C:4001:DCF4:4544:7CE:D190:5ADB (talk) 21:00, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reject Based on what sources? Most of the sources in the xx (album) article have it lower case. Dan56 (talk) 00:06, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- That's just how it's styled though. 2601:8C:4001:DCF4:4544:7CE:D190:5ADB (talk) 00:26, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  - Stylization is not above titling policies. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 01:59, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, per, WP:COMMONAME. © Tbhotch^™ (en-2.5). 01:59, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per MOS:TM, but I see why sources have it as lowercase so I'm willing to change my opinion. ONR (talk) 18:38, 25 February 2016 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Old Naval Rooftops (talk • contribs)
Oppose. Sources overwhelmingly use lowercase "xx". sst✈ 07:50, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.