Talk:Jammu & Kashmir National Conference

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

me as a kurdish man give true to a kashmirian people to have they are won home and freedom, and sorry i cant say more because i cant write good english , serdar star from kurdistan

Crap by Rao Ravindra[edit]

I removed some crap added by Rao Ravindra, Omar Abdullah is not a separist you idiot, try to keep your RSS-ness out of this. Thanks, Fernando Yuzitski--213.236.41.68 (talk) 14:06, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Omar Abdulla has separatist tendencies[edit]

Actions and speeches of Omar Abdulla (and his father Farooq Abdulla) in the last two months are evidence of their separatist thoughts and actions. If they do not go to the extremes, it is only because they know the consequences: they will be jailed as happened in 1953 and lose the huge benefits they enjoy at the cost of tax payers as a Minister in the government of India or as Chief Minister of a state. (If citations are needed, I can cite or anyone can look up Omar Abdulla’s speech on vote of confidence in July and his and his father's other speeches.) When Fernando Yuzitski uses such foul language and uses words like “crap” and “idiot”, I wonder whether he is competent enough to write in a civilized forum like Wikipedia or become an editor. He does not know the correct spelling of “separatist” and writes it as “separist”. (An indication of his level of education?) He imputes motives to me (“you idiot, try to keep your RSS-ness out of this” is what he has written). How is he so presumptuous about me? Anyway, how did he think that his point of view is better than my point of view? Let him prove his point (of Omar Abdulla not being a separatist) by valid arguments. Use of words like “crap” and “idiot” does not prove his point. Such usage only proves his arrogance in assuming that his point of view is the right point of view. Rao Ravindra (talk) 21:06, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality?[edit]

Did someone forget this when writing this astonishing piece on the National Conference? It would appear from Wikipedia that there has never been a controversy over election rigging (now admitted by most senior J&K politicians) or that anyone other than Pandits have ever died. For information India estimates that 208 Pandits have died in the past 20 years due to the conflict compared to over 47,000 Kashmiris. Balance would require at least substantial coverage of the latter but this article mentions nothing on it at all. I have made certain changes but NPOV is something Wikipedia has yet to achieve on key and global issues like Palestine and Kashmir.Astari5 (talk) 07:06, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jammu & Kashmir National Conference. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:25, 18 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit on Ideology[edit]

Was this edit by Yashodhan Ganu supported by a source? For the matter of that, was there a source cited for the ideology previously given? I see that KumarVenati has now removed the ideology value altogether, which is correct if there is no available source for the actual ideology. DES (talk)DESiegel Contribs 20:45, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Most of this article is unsourced. But nothing in it is controversial. If people delete stuff without explanation, please feel free to reinstate it. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:56, 25 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:24, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]