Talk:Jannik Hansen/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 18:48, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   I changed the lead slightly. I eliminated the space between the introduction sentence and the second paragraph. I don't see a reason to separated the two and it eliminates a one sentence paragraph. I also made a light change later in the article where the word season was used twice in quick succession as I felt it was a little awkward. Other than those minor very things its a very good read and well pu together

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   There is only one issue with the links. Reference #6 "Defense, goaltendering anchor of 2006–07" redirects to the Colts home page.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   All images contain proper licensing.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Another solid article that I will pass once the redirecting link is taken care of.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 18:48, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

Done. Thanks for the review! Orlandkurtenbach (talk) 22:49, 17 February 2011 (UTC)

No problem. I've passed the article. Good work.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 02:56, 18 February 2011 (UTC)