Talk:Jarawa language (Andaman Islands)

Languages High‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

India: Andaman & Nicobar Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Andaman and Nicobar Islands (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article was last assessed in March 2012.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): RounakN.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:07, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled[edit]

This article was created using Aka-Bo language as a base. (Taivo (talk) 20:16, 13 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Peer View of Article[edit]

I really enjoyed a lot of the information you put in your article. If I were to give any suggestions to improve the overall quality of the article, I'd suggest to cut down some of the history of your language and focus more on the information that deals with the vocabulary, grammar, and phonology of your language. Also, I noticed some of your sentences can be more neutral to the audience. Rephrasing some sentences can help fix this problem. Lastly, some more information in your lead might capture more attention for your article. I believe a sweep of your article while keeping these suggestions in mind has the potential in improving your article. Overall, I really thought your article and language was very interesting. Good luck! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Djh224 (talk • contribs) 01:21, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review[edit]

Hello-- I think this article has a good, substantive amount of information. That being said, I think this information gets put on the back burner with the amount of cultural and historical information that is provided within the article. While this information is definitely interesting, it did not really contribute to our understanding of the language-- if the people's lifestyle greatly affected the language, then I could understand having information about the way the people hunt, etc, but this doesn't seem to be the case. So, I would definitely try to trim the article of things like the culture section, religion, hunting & diet, and even the kinship section. Definitely move relevant information, like the phonology section, more towards the top, and make your lead a bit more catching. Other than that, and a few grammatical tweaks, your article looks great! Your sources look great. Katherinemoretti (talk) 15:21, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]