Talk:Jealousy in religion

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Religion Low‑importance

	Religion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religion, a project to improve Wikipedia's articles on Religion-related subjects. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the wikiproject page for more details.ReligionWikipedia:WikiProject ReligionTemplate:WikiProject ReligionReligion articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sections[edit]

why 2 sections for christinity?

no section for islam? 77.31.205.25 (talk) 15:03, 16 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It does not make sense to me either. We should combine the 2 sections into one. Λua∫Wi se ^{(Operibus anteire)} 11:48, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That was as a result of vandalism committed by an anonymous user. It has been reverted. Joshua Issac (talk) 22:39, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Does this belong to jealousy, too?[edit]

http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/topics/killed.html

Austerlitz -- 83.236.20.12 (talk) 11:26, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nadav and Avihu Some year ago I thought that the god in action here is fathergod punishing the use of an incent offering to mothergod. Most probably ficttion of mine; is it not?

Austerlitz -- 88.75.202.173 (talk) 11:27, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jealousy in religion. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120424230426/http://spa.qibla.com/issue_view.asp?HD=7&ID=2955&CATE=105 to http://spa.qibla.com/issue_view.asp?HD=7&ID=2955&CATE=105

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:17, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]