Talk:Jenny Macklin

This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Politics and Government

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Australia: Queensland / Victoria / Melbourne / Politics Low‑importance

	Australia portal Jenny Macklin is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Victoria (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Melbourne (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian politics (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Victoria, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Untitled[edit]

this will need editing when we find out who takes over from latham. The bellman 12:29, 2005 Jan 19 (UTC)

Ambi, first off, I was making a point with the last edit. I still fail to see how Macklin can be described as a 'solid parliamentary performer' without sources but cant be described as a failure as Deputy Leader without sources. Most people with a decent knowledge of politics would agree both are true. --RaiderAspect 01:01, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I think this could all be solved by getting a cite for both. I'd be very surprised if we couldn't find quite a few commentators to quote who've said exactly both those things. Ambi 02:23, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You'd think so, but I cant seem to find anything from google. I'll have a more indepth look tomorrow. --RaiderAspect 08:36, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Try Factiva if you have access to it. Ambi 09:31, 14 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Birthdate[edit]

Lede: 29 December
Infobox: 29 September.

Which? -- Jack of Oz ^{[your turn]} 11:24, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sanitation of Newstart Controversy[edit]

I've noticed that many references and comments pertaining to welfaregate are being slowly "sanitized." All material relating to the comments has been drawn from reliable sources and cited multiple times from reputable and national-level news organizations. As such, there is no basis for the "libel and slander" warnings contained in this article. Furthermore it should be watch-dogged for underlings and other involved parties trying to erase it from history, much as they tried to when the scandal broke. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.222.0.156 (talk) 21:41, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Julia Gillard official photo.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:58, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]