Talk:Jeongol

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Etymology[edit]

What is the etymology of this word? Badagnani (talk) 22:32, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find any but the picture looks terrible. It is not an authentic jeongol because the dish in the picture should be "pretty" in various colors.[1] Jjigae is for commoners, while jeongol was a dish for upper class people.--Appletrees (talk) 22:47, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, I see. This was a free photo and that is the nature of Wikipedia. Can you see if any of the other linked photos in the article are good? Badagnani (talk) 22:49, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I added that. So it was like gujeolpan. So was jeongol a dish in royal cuisine? Badagnani (talk) 22:52, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sinseollo is a varitey of jeongol and is a royal court cuisine. However every jeongol are not only for royalty. --Appletrees (talk) 22:58, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Why do you say "however," then, if they're both royal dishes? Badagnani (talk) 23:00, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I often miss to write not' or no. --Appletrees (talk) 23:02, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Was gujeolpan only for royalty, but also for upper-class non-royal Koreans? Badagnani (talk) 23:21, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Etymology dictionary[edit]

Can you check http://korean.go.kr/08_new/index.jsp and see what it says about beef? Badagnani (talk) 22:49, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No information about etymology. It says

Jeongol :n. a dish mixed with sliced meat, or seafood, vegetables, mushrooms, and seasonings, broth poured a little in jeongolteul (전골틀, a flat pot only for jeongol)

명」잘게 썬 고기에 양념, 채소, 버섯, 해물 따위를 섞어 전골틀에 담고 국물을 조금 부어 끓인 음식..--Appletrees (talk) 22:56, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It says "meat," not "beef"? Also, can there be a jeongol without seafood? The Korean royal court cuisine article compares it to a chowder, which is a seafood stew. Badagnani (talk) 23:03, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

In Korea, "고기" generally refers to nothing but beef, and I have not heard of jeongol made with pork or chicken. The two citations I added say about beef included in jeongol. In sogogi jeongol (소고기 beef jeongol), seafood is excluded but various mushrooms are added. In case, the jeongol is pretty much similar to bulgogi. --Appletrees (talk) 23:10, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Added a list of jeongol; please supplement as necessary. What does the 왕 in 왕만두전골 mean? Badagnani (talk) 23:19, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think we can take out "왕", because it is like "extra large" cheese burger. --Appletrees (talk) 23:30, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, fine. Badagnani (talk) 23:30, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Which broth[edit]

Which kind of broth is used? Badagnani (talk) 23:21, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It vary on recipe and types. --Appletrees (talk) 23:29, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 21:46, 3 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Jeongol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:13, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]