Talk:Jerry Jumonville

A fact from Jerry Jumonville appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 June 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that saxophonist Jerry Jumonville was usually part of any band featured in the 1970s television series Happy Days and Laverne & Shirley?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/June. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Jerry Jumonville.

Wikipedia

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Sources that can be used[edit]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Desertarun (talk) 21:04, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

Jerry Jumonville

... that saxophonist Jerry Jumonville was usually part of any band featured in the 1970s television series Happy Days and Laverne & Shirley?

Reviewed: Fredericka Martin

5x expanded by SL93 (talk). Self-nominated at 01:57, 31 May 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Hi SL93, nice work saving this from an unsourced sub-stub; review follow: more than 5x expansion from 31 May, article well written and cited inline throughout to reliable sources; I didn't spot any overly close paraphrasing; hook is interesting, mentioned in the article and backed up by source cited; image checks out back to Flickr under a CC-BY-SA 2.0 license (not sure why the crop is dual licensed with 4.0, but 2.0 is sufficient); a QPQ has been carried out. Looks fine to me - Dumelow (talk) 10:48, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Dumelow Thanks for the review. Can you add an approval template so this can appear under the approved nominations? SL93 (talk) 11:42, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Doh, of course - Dumelow (talk) 11:56, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]