Talk:Jewel Changi Airport

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Jewel Changi Airport article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

This article is written in Singaporean English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, centre, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Singapore Mid‑importance

	Singapore portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Singapore, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Singapore on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SingaporeWikipedia:WikiProject SingaporeTemplate:WikiProject SingaporeSingapore articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Redirect to Jewel Changi Airport (there is nothing to even merge)[edit]

Consensus to redirect The Rain Vortex to section in this article Justanothersgwikieditor (talk) 02:49, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

I don't need to use AFD, I'm not deleting anything because this article has ZERO unique content! Why in the world does this need to duplicate the information already in the other one? Background section: All about the Jewel, not the waterfall. Design section: All about the Jewel, not the waterfall. Structure section: Already in the Jewel article because this is part of the Jewel! Reywas92^Talk 05:16, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of constantly trying to bypass the consensus process, how about we try to improve the article? The Jewel entry should have a short summary of the Rain Vortex but not go into the details. There has been plenty of news media coverage that focuses on the Rain Vortex itself rather than the Jewel. Sounder Bruce 05:33, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reywas92, SounderBruce: I have moved the merge discussion to here, as it is typically done on the target page. robertsky (talk) 09:50, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I also see plenty of space in this Jewel article that is not prohibitive to an expansion of it instead. How about we improve this, then when it's at a place to justify a split we do that? The sources currently in the article as well as the ones in further research put the waterfall in the context of the building's architecture and without so much independent detail that it should be split from the main page. I just added another source and info about the design, but it fits just fine here, with no need for repetition. Reywas92^Talk 18:42, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Key points are already in Jewel Changi Airport. Redirect. – robertsky (talk) 06:50, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

File:JewelSingaporeVortex1.jpg scheduled for POTD[edit]

Hello! This is to let editors know that the featured picture File:JewelSingaporeVortex1.jpg, which is used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for May 14, 2021. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2021-05-14. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:57, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jewel Changi Airport is a nature-themed entertainment and retail complex in Changi Airport, Singapore, linked to three of its passenger terminals. Its centrepiece is the world's tallest indoor waterfall, the Rain Vortex, which is surrounded by a terraced forest setting. It houses around 3,000 trees and 60,000 shrubs of 120 species from high-altitude, tropical forest habitats around the world.

Photograph credit: Matteo Morando

Recently featured:

Significant WP:NOTTRAVELGUIDE violations[edit]

As of now, the Attractions, Facilities, and Access sections are excessively detailed with trivia about the various installations at Jewel. Much of the specific stuff about the attractions e.g. pricing, lists of F&B outlets on each level, specifications of the slides, and list of bus services can and should be removed as non-encyclopaedic. I've tagged the article accordingly and boldly reversed the Good Article nomination by JohnShakur as it would need lots of work to meet GA criteria 1b and 3. ~ KN2731 {talk · contribs} 04:56, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]