Talk:Jewish Indian theory

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Looks like a great article[edit]

Just needs the citations fixed so they show all the required details including page numbers. Doug Weller talk 16:32, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 09:00, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Created by Bondegezou (talk). Nominated by LordPeterII (talk) at 20:34, 7 September 2022 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.
Overall: Overall, article and hook meet eligibility, earwig indicates unlikely copyright violation, and I see no reason to not approve this submission. Let me know if there is any rephrasing of the hook, but as is, it seems good to go. JJonahJackalope (talk) 17:21, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

erroneous[edit]

why are we calling it erroneous? It's a theory, it should just say it's the idea of jews in the Americas, with BYU academics supproting the theory. This whole article is just debunking a claim, if that's the articals goal we should delete or merge it. LuxembourgLover (talk) 20:56, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We should call it erroneous because it is erroneous and reliable sources describe it as erroneous. Wikipedia articles on theories generally explain whether they are accepted, not accepted, or disputed.
The article’s goal is to describe the long history of the theory. The Mormon view is only a small part of the article. This isn’t an anti-Mormon article. It’s an article about the history of people’s understanding of the origins of Native American people, principally in the 16th and 17th centuries. Bondegezou (talk) 08:51, 8 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]