Talk:Jim van Os

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.

Importance[edit]

Is he notable enough to be at Wikipedia? If yes, more info should be added, IMHO. I've found a and added a couple of books. Best regards, --CopperKettle 13:17, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

yes. He is a key figure in the emgerging work on voice hearing in the general population. the following article is a key reference Johns, Louise C.; Jim van Os (2001). "The continuity of psychotic experiences in the general population". Clinical Psychology Review 21 (8): 1125–41. doi:10.1016/S0272-7358(01)00103-9. PMID 11702510. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0272-7358(01)00103-9. He was one of the people in the maudsley debates on schizophrenia as a scientific delusion [1]

what is IMHO ? Earlypsychosis (talk) 07:50, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]