Talk:Jiva (disambiguation)
 | Disambiguation | |||
| ||||
2 non-notable articles & COI articles = fail "reasonably likely" so no reason to list per WP:MOSDAB. Revert to original merged dab. Widefox; talk 00:12, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
- Object Jiwa is not the same as Jiva. Among other things, Jiwa is an ERP system, an Indian food company, and is a valid spelling of the Indonesian word for "soul". Jiva, whilst also being an acceptable spelling for the Indonesian word for "soul", is also an clothing company, and Australian ISP, and a Indian philosophy and religion.Scottpearce1976 (talk) 04:08, 22 October 2014 (UTC)— Scottpearce1976 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- It is a dab with 1 valid entry (plus 1 currently non-notable COI entry (pending AfD) plus 1 other COI soon to be deleted AfD). We don't create dab pages for dictionary definitions. There was consensus for the two terms to be dealt with on one dab before this split into two dabs, and I've objected to the split edit (see reasoning in edit summaries and user talk pages), so it will go back to that consensus. I thought I'd give it a chance to gather further opinions, and reach consensus but being as you are an WP:SPA editor with a declared WP:COI, I think it would be better for the two of you COI editors to step back, read the COI guideline and edit within that. Also, familiarise yourself with WP:TWODABS (why this dab is already unnecessary with 2 entries) and WP:MOSDAB (splitting etc). Widefox; talk 09:12, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
Bold, Speedy[edit]
As I'm only contesting the split edit, and the split dab has 1 valid entry so qualifies for CSD I'm reverting back to the previous consensus of a merged dab in the mean time. While I should not have not opened the merge request, I but didn't know it would be this clear cut. Widefox; talk 13:28, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
