Talk:Joan Jett/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Grammar nerdage

"He mentioned a local bass player, Gary Ryan, that had recently been crashing on his couch." It should be "...who had recently been crashing..." "That" describes things. A little pedantic, but still, WIKI's supposed to be accurate, right? 71.178.136.83 (talk) 15:38, 13 June 2009 (UTC)Jim

A little late, but still relevant: Do it do it do it! If you see a problem w/grammar, spelling, punctuation, usage, syntax, or anything else that'd be shameful in a bound & printed encyclopedia -- fix it. Make it nice. Don't be afraid (unless you're wrong) and don't bother commenting about it in Discussion. Just edit until it's perfect. Sugarbat (talk) 19:11, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Bisexual category

It says nowhere in this article that she is bisexual, so why is she listed as a bisexual musician? She's very queer-friendly, but I've never heard anything about her sexual preference. Thorns Among Our Leaves 01:11, 16 October 2005 (UTC)

I removed it. I expect somebody will try adding it back, and claim "everybody knows it's true". That category should obviously only be used if it's mentioned in the article, with a reliable source. --rob 02:17, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
It's a common misconception that categories must be backed up in the article. Whether or not this category applies here, categories are useful on their own and should not require additional backup in the article, unless there's serious controversy. As a matter of fact I don't think there's any controversy about Joan Jett, though she has not publicly come out. --Kstern999 21:41, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
Sounds good, except for the fact that now I have "Make Believe" (a JJ song, nonetheless!) stuck in my head. I know, you know... everybody knows it's true... x_x Thanks! Thorns Among Our Leaves 17:16, 16 October 2005 (UTC)
I worked with Jett a number of times in 1996. What was "known" about her then, and supported by her conversation, was that she was a lesbian. At least till that point, I had never heard her mention having a relationship with a man. I don't know, as an assistant recording engineer, that I am a "reliable source." Bifurcation 14:45, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

I worked in a camera store at Roosevelt Field Mall on Long Island in 1987. Joan came into the store with a young female child and older gentleman. Could the man have been Kenny Laguna? The child was about 10 though I could not tell the relationship between the 2. Could it be possible Joan has a child? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.202.98.90 (talk) 05:40, 14 October 2007 (UTC)

I just want to add, that out of respect for the queen of rock n roll, we should not specify her sexual orientation without asking her!!!! I hope she is bisexual because i am a 31 year old man and I think she is hot!!!!68.186.59.182 (talk) 04:55, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Well, Cherie Currie said in the Edgeplay Documentary that she and Joan had sex during their time in the Runaways. But I guess that's not a valid sorce either?@@ DingoateMyBabyyy 23:21, 29 March 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by DingoateMyBabyyy (talk • contribs)

Where's the proof? Is there an article saying this? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.71.172.124 (talk) 02:48, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
I do not understand your question. Where's the proof to what? If you are asking that Cherie Currie said in Edgeplay that she and Joan had sex during their time in the documentaries, then yes she did. I have to ask if you are aware that Edgeplay is a documentary filmed with interviews of many former members of the Runaways, but Joan would not participate. The film is not conveniently transcribed so that one can say on page 108, paragraph 3, Cherie Currie said this. You would have to watch the documentary. The documentary is a valid reference tool, but it is the selected recollections of several women who may or may not have had some political agenda, so therefore it may be hearsay. However, if Cherie Currie made the statement in court, or had it notarized, then she could be considered a reliable source as she would be considered a witness to the mentioned events. Mburrell (talk) 09:35, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

When has she said that she's bisexual or when did this rumor come about? I thought that she was presumed to be lesbian?72.94.58.110 (talk) 00:15, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

I don't know if this constitutes proof that Jett 'is a lesbian', but Kira Roessler (formerly of Black Flag) said in passing during an interview on this website that she and Jett had had sex. Lexo (talk) 11:46, 9 July 2011 (UTC) In the dramatic film "The Runaways" (2010), she can be seen foling around with girls (where as Cherie Currie had sex with Producer Kim Fowley and others).Saemikneu (talk) 18:30, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Excessive negativity?

While charting at 19 and 57 is a drop from ILRR, Album still charted higher than Bad Reputation and Glorious Results' position is nothing to sneeze at. Aside from charting, Glorious Results is easily her most consistent album to that point and, while lacking a breakthrough hit song, it's a quality album. (Few artists get even one ILRR to drive an album, much less do it again.) Describing these as 'two clunkers' is a region of opinion but goes so far as to be virtually 'incorrect'. Good Music was a disaster, on the other hand.

She was not a 'backup' singer in the Runaways, but a 'backing' vocalist when she wasn't lead vocalist. In a band sense, Curie was the 'lead' but on a track by track basis, Joan would often take lead vocals.

Wouldn't hurt to mention DDDDC was later released on Hit List, though the version lacked energy and the album was incoherent. Also, an expansion on the so-called 'Riot Grrl' thing and a mention of L7 (they recorded 'Cherry Bomb' together, for instance) wouldn't be out of place. It's not so much that the Runaways were huge or Joan Jett or even all the 'Riot Grrl' bands but, together, they form a large and influential stream. Maybe also more on her influences, which are 50s/60s rock, punk, and metal. She didn't just randomly cover everything from Tommy James to AC/DC, but these permeate all her own music, as well. (Part of the reason Hit List was such a bomb was that it didn't convey any of this very well.)

I don't feel up to editing the article because I'm largely ignorant of her non-musical information and I'm biased regarding her music (which I do know) but I still feel my perception is accurate and that this article doesn't really 'capture' Joan Jett yet. --68.221.118.89 20:22, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Danny Bonaduce claimed he had an intimate encounter with her on the radio recently.

Wouldn't that violate one or two FCC regulations? Sugarbat (talk) 19:15, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Stephanie Adams

I've flagged a mention of Stephanie Adams with a FACT tag; see this for the reason why. -- Hoary 02:43, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Now in the archive of that discussion page. The (near-) consensus on the talk page of Stephanie Adams was that very little of what the article said was both verifiable and non-trivial. So mention of Joan Jett has been deleted from it. -- Hoary 09:20, 5 May 2006 (UTC)

MusicBrainz

Could be a good link to get to her (and other artists) production of released music from MusicBrainz. They have some information about that she performed under the alias Patti Rasnick (See : Joan Jet's entry).

Like:

Wig???

The article states in the Trivia section that her hair during the Up Your Alley era was a wig?? Is this true? Is there a source for this? Has she admitted this? I would like to see a source verifying this. I searched the Internet and found NOTHING on it. Can someone help me out here?--Sivazh 19:02, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

The author of the wig edit said in their edit summary that they were an assistant on the tour. I guess that goes against wikipedia’s no-primary-research rule but I think those ideological guidelines are mostly meant to smooth out controversy. This seems harmless (and why would someone make that up, I figure?) so I do not think it matters much whether it stays or goes.--209.6.158.247 08:32, 14 September 2006 (UTC)

God, I wish there were more editors like you. You Joan Jett fans are always so much fucking cooler and laid-back than the goddamn Pink Floyd editors who crouch over their computers all day waiting for someone to make a less-than-perfect edit so they can immediately revert it. You could never get away with "This seems harmless . . . " with those obsessos. That edit would be reverted literally one minute after it was posted. And I mean "literally" literallly; it's happened to me, an edit reverted 60 seconds after I posted it. I don't recomend editing Pink Floyd articles.
Besides, yeah, of course it was a wig. Whoever has hair like that? (BTW, did anybody think Ric Ocasek's hair (circa 1984 thru today) is real? Rumor is, he's actually smooth as a billiard ball.)
Rock on,
--Ben Culture (talk) 05:41, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Cats - Where?

So is she from Philadelphia or Long Island - the cats say both.TerriNunn 01:04, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Long Island?

Why is Joan listed in the "People from Nassau County, New York" category?

She's lived on Long Island for many years.

Jett a New York Jets fan?

The picture shows a Joe Namath jersy. Chivista 22:13, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

She an ORIOLES fan! Cripes, this article is useless  :(

And has said in several places including her newly released book of photos/commentary, a big Packers fan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BubbaGrace (talk • contribs) 01:11, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Joan Jett's date of birth

I ask anybody who wishes to change the birth year to place say something here on the talk page, and please put in a footnote. For now, I'm going by imdb. Also, please label your changes in your edit summary, and try not to lump birth-date change with other, possibly valid changes. Otherwise, you force others to keep all the changes, or revert them all (the latter being common and unpleasant) --rob 10:41, 21 September 2005 (UTC)

Hey Rob,

I changed Joan Jett's birth date to 1960. While this is a subject of speculation among fans, her date of birth has always been listed as September 22,1960. Most sources including answers,com list this date as her birthday. (UNSIGNED)

1958 and 1960 are shown. We need a verifiable source. IMDb gives 1958,[1] so I've used this. Any change should be backed up with a reference. Please note many sites such as answers.com mentioned above are just mirrors of wikipedia. Tyrenius 20:25, 1 January 2007 (UTC)

Although I also think 1958 is most likely, I would also support the complete removal of the year of birth, until we have a truly reliable source, and feel certain of it. As long as the article can state when various things happened (e.g. album release years), we can give people the required context of when stuff happened, without risking making a factual error. I won't personally remove 1958 as the year, but if somebody changes it back to 1960 again, I will remove that year. --Rob 05:26, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Someone changed it to 1960 again, but I've changed it back. If you want to remove it entirely I don't care, but it seems like we should be able to find a source somewhere. Natalie 19:31, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Today, again, it was made 1960. I find 1958 at IMDB and 1960 at allmusic, and no notation anywhere else including her own website. Maybe it should be noted either/or, until a definitive source is found? Salamurai 15:23, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

I found an interview with Jett from Aug 2006 where she's asked how she feels about being 47. That would support her being born in 1958 (to be 48 a month later in 2006), but I wouldn't call it definitive. http://www.montrealmirror.com/2006/080306/cover_music.html Salamurai 15:34, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

When generally reliable sources contradict one another, they should all be cited and the discrepancy noted in a footnote. For an extreme example, see the footnotes on the birthdate of Magda Lupescu. - Jmabel | Talk 20:47, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Maybe someone might notice that being born in 1958 (or 1960) and moving to Van Nuys in 1962, at the age of 13, is incompatible.DOR (HK) (talk) 06:02, 12 February 2008 (UTC)DOR (HK) Feb 12, 2008
I would tend to agree that Sept 1958 seems to line up with sources. This article in Aug 2010 http://www.leaderpost.com/entertainment/Even+punk+rocker+hasn+lost+edge/3444649/story.html calls her 51. I think she will turn 52 in about a month. The 13yo move to Van Nuys in 71 (http://www.joanjett.net/) just means she moved after Sept 22 1971 and had just turned 13. I would suggest that the bd is probably correct as Sept 1958. --66.208.188.254 (talk) 13:19, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

The date of birth seems to be getting changed frequently by anonymous people. I changed it back to 1958 today. Perhaps this paged should be protected to prevent this continued year changing battle. Ronark (talk) 14:14, 24 September 2008 (UTC)

I have reverted again to 1958 and introduced the sources suggested above to support that date. If anyone finds a source that includes an interview with Jett citing a different age or year of birth then we can document the 1960 allegation as well. Elizium23 (talk) 03:42, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

Discography

The discography section needs to be reorganized- separated by studio albums, live albums, compilations, etc. --Hotdoglives 04:18, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

Photos

Several of my 1994 photos I've placed in the linked Commons category include other unidentified musicians (presumably mostly members of the Blackhearts). Someone who knows their way well around Jett's collaborators might be able to improve the photo descriptions. - Jmabel | Talk 20:44, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Robert Pollard comment

Who the fuck removed the comment that Robert Pollard made in the trivia section? It's genuine fucking trivia - ZEROpumpkins 12:18, 16 July 2007 (UTC)

  • Never mind, it's back - ZEROpumpkins 11:45, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Politics

I remember reading somewhere that she was a spokeswoman for the New York State Democratic Party. Can anyone confirm or deny this? --Eastlaw (talk) 06:14, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

She has also been a vegetarian for over 20 years. is part of the Politics section. Is this a political subject?--TudorTulok (talk) 21:36, 11 June 2011 (UTC)
I know she was a delegate during the 2004 Presidential election; I remember seeing her interviewed on TV at the Democratic Party Convention. Is that what you're thinking of?
--Ben Culture (talk) 05:52, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Notable Instrument

I was wondering why nobody added this (I did): she played on a Gibson Melody Maker guitar, and Gibson even made a Joan Jett Signature model, though I saw her playing on a few other models in some pictures - is that worth writing?

It would be nice to see what her past and present guitar, effects, amps, cab setup is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.175.223.38 (talk) 23:08, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

I agree completely; I hope these things got into the article since you posted this comment. Being the rhythm guitarist in her band is a big part of what makes Joan Jett Joan Jett. A rock musician instead of a pop singer. It's a position of power.
--Ben Culture (talk) 05:56, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

"The Hit list" is not a compilation"

I don't agree with the album "The hit list" being marked as a compilation album. It's not a compilation album, its a Cover album. That was not an album in wich several hits from past albums by joan were compiled, it's an album composed only by covers of AC/DC, Sex Pistols or whatever. It's "The spaghetti incident" a compilation album By Guns n' Roses?. No, it was a new whole album, with no original songs, only punk covers. Same thing with "the hit list".--Barfly2001 (talk) 16:43, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

LGBT category

I put in the LGBT catagory, per Joan's plea that we take her music's word for it, as is sourced in the article. -- AvatarMN (talk) 20:17, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

No. Joan has never expressly self-identified. A living person must self-identify with the label in question. Asarelah (talk) 00:54, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Her saying that her music has identified the issue doesn't do the job? You want to be one of those people that she mocks for not being able to figure it out? -- AvatarMN (talk) 06:24, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
No disrespect, but I really don't give a damn what Joan Jett thinks of me. The rules say that that living people must EXPRESSLY self-identify as the sexual orientation in question, not dance around the question. Ergo, I'm leaving the category out. Asarelah (talk) 20:42, 12 December 2008 (UTC)
But what Joan said conveys that she feels she hasn't danced around the question. We'd infer nothing, she said "but I do it (answer questions about my sexuality) in my music". -- AvatarMN (talk) 03:27, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
I disagree very strongly. Please review http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Categories She just hasn't given a direct answer. If you still have a problem with this, we can list this discussion under requests for comment. Asarelah (talk) 17:02, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
Joan's intent is absolutely clear and direct. We know because she says, clearly and directly, that her music can be trusted on the subject and mocks what she sees as the cluelessness of those who don't get it. People get fairly identified as LGBT on Wikipedia all the time when they identfy a same-sex parter but don't "expressly" use the words "I'm gay" or "I'm bi". This is the same thing. If the guidelines are designed to protect a living person, then it's a clear case of WP:Wikilawyering to use the guidelines to override the principles of the guideline. Joan could hardly be more blunt that she wants people to understand her from her music and respect her decision to talk about this only in her music. Whether any of us think Joan's been clear enough comes second to her sourced statement that she feels she has been clear enough, and policies allow for some discretion in order to stick to the principles of the policies, i.e.: WP:IAR and all the other caveats in each guideline. -- AvatarMN (talk) 19:29, 21 December 2008 (UTC)
I'm afraid that we must agree to disagree. I'll list this under requests for comment. Asarelah (talk) 17:45, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
It hasn't shown up yet. -- AvatarMN (talk) 07:21, 24 December 2008 (UTC)

I find it humorous in light of the article that we would be having a debate over any question of categorizing her when she has stated that she will not do so (I see no "plea" but the implied plea to let the issue alone). Leave the little section in the article invoking the controversy, and let her keep her mystery going (at this point, any conclusion one might draw after reviewing her music as she suggests in the interview would by definition be opinion, synthesis, and OR; fun, but not appropriate for encyclopedia).Steveozone (talk) 01:21, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Surely what is relevant, if not clear, about Joan's statement is: if her sexual orientation can be determined from her music, then wouldn't it be fair to say that the one thing she wants is to not tell the press, the media, and in fact anyone but her fans, what that is? In other words, whatever your personal policy on outing, Wikipedia's is that we don't out, and Joan doesn't want you to. Anarchangel (talk) 10:10, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

External link suggestion: New interview with Joan Jett

As an editor at Crawdaddy!, and to comply with COI guidelines, I am not posting the link to this new interview with Joan Jett and her manager, Kenny Laguna. However, I would like to recommend it on its merits, and hope that an editor will find the time to examine the interview and—if he or she sees fit—post it to the external links section on this page. I appreciate your time. Crawdaddy! [2]
Mike harkin (talk) 18:26, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Request for Comment: Sexual orientation categories

Strong Oppose : This speculation upon Joan's sexuality is no more factually conclusive than, and follows the same methodology as, a reading of the I Ching. If it is as spiritually uplifting, then it is so at the expense of WP verifiability. Her 'cited' comments' primary characteristic is deliberate vagueness, with the one exception being when she specifically and repeatedly made it clear that she doesn't want to say. Anarchangel (talk) 21:56, 26 December 2008 (UTC)

Oppose The rules on biographies of living persons are fairly clear about this. Martin Hogbin (talk) 21:35, 27 December 2008 (UTC)

Comment Steve: Joan saying "if you don't get it from my music, you won't from me talking to you" is not a plea to leave it alone, it's an invitation to refer to a previous statment and confirmation that the statement is accurate. Angel: Coming out in something public but directed at fans is a far cry from coming out to family and not the public. Darren Hayes came out on his web site, and I don't hear anyone saying that he was outed to non-fans by the reports on his statement at his site. Martin: the guidelines about Wikilaywering and upholding intent over misuse of the language are fairly clear about this. -- AvatarMN (talk) 20:29, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Oppose : I don't see her confirming anything in the interview, I see her being coy. The invitation to the reader to refer to her body of work and draw one's own conclusions is an invitation to engage in WP:OR and WP:SYN, fine for fan mags, not for an encyclopedia. There's enough here to justify only the existing article section indicating that she has purposefully encouraged speculation and cultivated mystique. Steveozone (talk) 21:28, 28 December 2008 (UTC)

Comment Now after reading the quote from the Spinner interview that's been added to the article, I feel like a little bit of an asshole... But with just the Seattle Times interview alone, I really believed she was saying she considered herself out. -- AvatarMN (talk) 07:50, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Well I guess its settled then. Don't feel like an asshole, we all make mistakes like this. Asarelah (talk) 15:15, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
  • RfC response: Wikipedia's policy is that the only way that a living person can be included in a subjective category (religion, political party, sexuality) is that the party in question must explicitly say so in to a reputable, verifiable, published source. Wikipedia does not interpret song lyrics to determine these things, even if it seems obvious, because this is an EXTREMELY dangerous precedent and goes against WP's policy of original research. For example, if you listen to Toby Keith's lyrics, you would swear down that he was a Republican although he self-identifies as Democrat. What Wikipedia does do is report on the facts. The facts here: she made the above oft-quoted statement and her lyrics include LGBT themes. The reader can draw their own conclusions -- which will probably lead to the truth anyway.--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 18:03, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Comment We're a couple of years down the line, now, and The Runaways film, Executive Produced by Jett, shows her to be at least bisexual. That's not just an interview, it's tantamount to an authorized biography. Thoughts? Kdring (talk) 04:11, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Just because someone had affairs with both sexes doesn't necessarily mean that they accept the label of bisexual. There are plenty of living people who acknowledge to being involved with men and women but expressly reject the label. I'm fine with including her same-sex affairs in her "personal life" section, but I don't think slapping a label on her that she may not identify with is a good idea. Asarelah (talk) 17:16, 5 May 2011 (UTC)

New pic?

How 'bout a newer updated pic? EnDaLeCoMpLeX (talk) 04:03, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

That was a great picture, but you're right about it being dated. I put in a newer picture found at the commons. -- AvatarMN (talk) 07:23, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
It occurred to me that the former infobox picture could be used lower down. -- AvatarMN (talk) 07:31, 6 January 2009 (UTC)
Thank you! I agree, it was great, but the new is excellent! EnDaLeCoMpLeX (talk) 22:02, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

Maryland or California - Age 12 - 16

I am not sure the Wikipedia article is correct about where Joan Jett went to high school. The article says that she moved to Wheaton, MD in '67 (11 to 12 years old) and attended high school there. Classmates.com <http://www.classmates.com/directory/school/Wheaton%20High%20School_3.jsp?org=1800> says a Joan Larkin attended Wheaton High School in Maryland from 1971 to 1975. That would be from age 13 to 16. Various articles then say that a parental transfer brought her to Los Angeles, but not when. At least three articles say she moved to L.A. at age 12. <http://therunaways.com/> then select the Joan Jett page, <http://www.vh1.com/artists/az/jett_joan/bio.jhtml>, and <http://www.inoutstar.com/news/Joan-Jett-born-Joan-Marie-Larkin-1972.html> Is there any proof that she went to high school in Maryland, or is that just another Joan Larkin? Or is it a history re-write to imply she was in L.A. earlier than she was? If Joan was born in 1958, then she was a 16 year old going on 17 when she founded The Runaways, and yet most articles say she was 15. If that is part of the rock myth, then is her L.A. years pre-'75 also a myth? Mburrell (talk) 09:24, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

I don't have dates but Joan Jett went to high school for a short time at Irmo High School just outside of Columbia SC. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucktoday1 (talk • contribs) 16:00, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

I've seen the picture of Joan Larkin from the Wheaton High School 1974 yearbook, and I'm convinced it's her. That's in Wheaton, MD, not Rockville as the article claims. The nose, the shape of the face, it's all there. https://fbcdn-sphotos-g-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/1002580_10201910656556809_2035387412_n.jpg If it wasn't OR I'd cite it (but original research is allowed to talk pages like this one). Merenta (talk) 03:19, 12 August 2013 (UTC)

Organization of Article

Could really use some reorganization. Took a stab at starting this, but I think we need some major categories and subheadings. --99.145.183.77 (talk) 16:52, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

More sources are needed

The {{BLP sources}} template was removed today, but I question the wisdom of doing that. This is a longish article and only has 25 cites. One, the VH1 bio, is used eight times. There are whole sections without enough footnotes. Joan Jett and the Blackhearts has zero; Later years - a huge section - has five by my count; Current projects has ONE - for current projects?! Can't we find anything in Google News? There was no discussion or attempt to add reliable sources and so I'll add the template back unless there is some reasonable objection here. Elizium23 (talk) 04:09, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

Behind the Iron Curtain

I must admit I have no idea what is this supposed to say: "Jett was the second American act of any kind to perform behind the Iron Curtain". Poland, for one, which was definitely behind the Iron Curtain until 1989, had oodles of American acts of various kinds visiting throughout the '60s and '70s, including the time before Joan Jett even started playing in a band. Something is messed up about that statement. -- Bmucha 02:01, 29 December 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.254.144.86 (talk)

Right, now the article says: "Jett was perhaps the third major American act to perform behind the Iron Curtain", which is still very doubtful (yeah, right, "perhaps"...); That probably alludes to her visit of the GDR (East Germany) in 1982. It certainly depends on what you understand under "major American act" (only rock? or punk rock? or what?). If you include blues and jazz, it's certainly not true. Spontaneously Muddy Waters in 1976 und Charles Mingus in 1972 (both in Poland) come to mind. Of course, the GDR was much stricter than Poland in these cultural things (actually than most of the other satellite states), but Poland is nevertheless clearly "behind the iron curtain". So the whole statment doesn't make sense and should be removed.--CosmoKramer09 (talk) 01:52, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
I agree, and the statement as it was contradicted the source's quote, so I removed the whole statement. Elizium23 (talk) 02:18, 22 October 2011 (UTC)
Ok, now I found at least this here [3] which might be the reason for the whole thing: The german news magazine Der Spiegel credited her in a 2010 interview as the first (major) US-american artist in the GDR ("die erste US-Amerikanerin, die in Ostdeutschland auftrat"), so that might be true... (Harry Belafonte, for example, did a concert in 1983, but that was a year after her concert in Weimar and a bit of a different kind of music). But "Iron Curtain" is certainly wrong.--CosmoKramer09 (talk) 02:28, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Personal Life

I find it interesting with all the talk about LGBT isssues, there is actually no Personal Life section. I know she likes to keep things to herself, but, really, nothing? — Preceding unsigned comment added by BubbaGrace (talk • contribs) 01:10, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Yes, I agree. For example, is she married? Where does she live, in Philly? Readers want to know. Plus, I don't know if a woman who would disband an all-girl group and put form the Blackhearts with an ad in the paper for "three good men" is really the "feminist musician" category. Chrisrus (talk) 07:32, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
Really. Nothing. She is a very private person and very good at controlling this information. If you want a place to mine for information, this one might be the best: http://www.joanjettbadrep.com/ DFS (talk) 23:05, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Blackhearts

This article needs far more information on the Blackhearts. I don't think there needs to be a separate article on the band (or does there??), but it is pretty insulting that she has had a band for more than 30 years and there is barely a mention of membership and their contributions other than from the earliest days of the band. DFS (talk) 06:10, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Kenny Laguna needs own article

Currently the wikipedia search Kenny Laguna redirects to this article Kenny was/is a significant session musician/writer/producer. I think he warrants his own article. I'm not sure how to change this "redirect". --Design (talk) 12:15, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

2009 Interview & some discography: http://www.musicpix.net/index.php/interviews/kenny_lagunas_life_of_music_-_joan_jetts_producer_and_partner_speaks/

  • 1979 Back in Your Life Jonathan Richman & the Modern Lovers Producer
  • 1982 I Want Candy (single) Bow Wow Wow Producer
  • 2002 Getting There Mary Kate and Ashley Olsen Producer
  • 2003 Fatherfucker Peaches Producer

2009 interview: http://www.northjersey.com/arts_entertainment/78942247.html --Design (talk) 12:45, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

joan jett rock'n'roll

Dimichion (talk) 19:59, 7 March 2013 (UTC)really, no? ;D in the U.S. it is called: "The queen of rock'n'roll". I think it would be logical to add the genre to the list. to check, enter the images.google.com: "queen of rock'n'roll" and you will find among these pictures a dozen other pictures with Joan Jett. Or take a look here http://trailsendconcertpark.com/show-schedule.html I'm not talking about her song Joan Jett - I love Rock'n'Roll.

Joan Jett's influence by Suzi Quatro

An editor, Gabe Godin, modified the Joan Jett article by removing text about how Suzi Quattro influenced Joan Jett. The text removed was the following:

In Los Angeles, Jett interacted with some of her idols, including Suzi Quatro, the first female bass guitar player to become a major rock star.[8]:1–3[9] Quatro was vital to Jett's career,[citation needed] and Jett adopted many of Quatro's qualities including her shag haircut and style. Jett would quietly wait in the lobby of various hotels that Quatro was staying in during her US tours, just to catch a glimpse of her.[10] She wore wooden platform shoes with "Suzi Quatro" carved into the side.

I feel that this needs discussion from the community before accepting the modification, but I don't want to get into an edit war without seeking feedback. Gabe Godin also posted this message on my personal talk page:

I edited Joan Jett's wikipedia page per the request of management.
Please do not edit the page again. You can feel free to look me up online and see my relation to the label.
Thank you for your time. If you have any questions, I am more than happy to discuss here or offline. Gabegodin (talk) 00:02, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

I am not too happy with this communication either. He does not say which management, whether Wikipedia or Joan Jett. When I search for him on Google, I find him describing himself as an artist, and he has a link to the Blackheart Records webpage, which does not mean necessarily mean that he speaks for Joan Jett. I also don't like the command not to edit the page again, but I will hold off until I see if there is any feedback from the community who helps maintain Joan's wikipedia page. The original section of the article did provide references, so it was not an arbitrary citing, and I don't like the arbitrary deletion. Mburrell (talk) 01:23, 24 July 2013 (UTC)


It has been mentioned that by emphasizing the influence of Suzi Quatro that other influences of Joan Jett are being de-emphasized or not listed. I can support deleting Suzi Quatro's section unless we can come up with a balanced section that lists several influences on her formative period or her music style.
Still, I would like feedback from other users of this article, and get a feel for what we want for this article.
I am satisfied with the explanation I got, and won't push to add back the deleted segment. I do support a discussion before deleting cited information, or if the deletion is accepted by consensus or apathy, then there should be a discussion before adding it back, in order to avoid edit wars. Mburrell (talk) 01:42, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
This diff shows another relevant edit to a personal talk page. I feel that the way forward is to add reliable citations/corrections to the disputed Suzi Quatro text, in line with WP:BLPSOURCES, and put it back. If there are reliable citations for the influence of Robert Plant, Pete Townsend, and Steven Tyler on Jett we should mention them too. If not, they should not be added to the article. So maybe we should all start looking for citations and add them to this talk page before putting stuff back into the article — Peter Loader (talk) 20:09, 28 July 2013 (UTC)
I deleted a link to my personal talk page in the previous edit. That is my talk page and I don't appreciate it being referenced in an article talk page. I don't find it courteous. If you want to discuss this we can develop a discussion here or take it to my talk page, but please note that I will actively edit links to my page unless someone can point out a Wikipedia rule or etiquette that says I must allow it. Mburrell (talk) 10:13, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
There is a Wikipedia rule that "encyclopedia articles [My emphasis] should never link to any userspace pages". See Wikipedia:User pages#Userspace and mainspace. But I could not find any rules preventing article talk pages linking to user talk pages.
The reason why my post included the diff (for an edit by another editor to your talk page) was that the edit really belongs on this talk page. I wanted to clarify my use of "Robert Plant, Pete Townsend, and Steven Tyler" as musicians who may have influenced Jett. However, I feel that anyone who wishes to find the origin of "Robert Plant, Pete Townsend, and Steven Tyler" can now easily look it up. So I am accepting your change to my post (but have tidied it up a bit) — Peter Loader (talk) 15:11, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Joan Jett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:36, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Joan Jett. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:55, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Joan's Fan club albums, Compilation albums, Collaboration albums, Japan-only releases, and Guest appearances

I'm adding Joan's Fan club albums, Compilation albums, Collaboration albums, Japan-only releases, and Guest appearances back on her page because it belongs their. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.26.190.94 (talk) 04:19, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Unfortunately, what feels right to one user is not necessarily correct. Fortunately, Wikipedia has developed rules and posted them for all to read. In this case, Wikipedia created Wikipedia:WikiProject Musicians/Article guidelines which defines what should be on an artist's page, and what should be on their Discography page. To quote directly from the page, "The discography section of the musician's primary article should also provide a summary of the musician's major works. In most cases this is done using a simple list of their studio albums, leaving a complete listing of releases to the discography article". This rules out the opinion that the fan club albums, collaborations and guest appearances deserve to belong on the Artist page. Fortunately, Joan Jett has a discography page, and her additional albums, such as extended plays, compilation albums, and singles are listed there. One idea for improving the article would be to list her guest appearances on her discography page. They don't belong on her artist page, and will be deleted. Mburrell (talk) 07:17, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Joan_Jett/Archive_1&oldid=1029341405"