Talk:Joe Ricketts

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

NPOV[edit]

I removed this;

In November 2010, the Cubs announced a plan to float government-backed bonds to pay for renovations to historic Wrigley Field [1], which has come under scruitiny due to among other things the current state of government debt and Ricketts' political activity (a noted Tea Party supporter/ small government advocate), a political position which puts his attempt to have government intervene on his business-behalf at odds with his stated political views.

it lacks a cite and does not seem NPOV. Paul, in Saudi (talk) 03:33, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

References

Content Edit[edit]

Per Biography of Living Person (BLP) standards, I propose the following edits. I’ll defer to senior editors and admins to move the edits to the live entry. If no action is taken within 3 days, I will proceed to update the live entry. (Belkin555 (talk) 21:54, 11 August 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Content Restructure[edit]

I propose the following template restructure to bring this entry more in line with industry standards. I’ll defer to senior editors and admins to move the edits to the live entry. If no action is taken within 3 days, I will proceed to update the entry.(Belkin555 (talk) 05:05, 26 August 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Conservative[edit]

Nowhere in the article does it mention that Mr. Ricketts champions conservative causes. In fact, one sentence characterized one of his political organizations as "nonpartisan." Would it still be NPOV to accurately note that he supports conservative causes?75.72.93.99 (talk) 12:20, 17 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1) I've moved this to the bottom of the page's comments block, in line with normal chronological listing.
2) If the comment is correct about what's in the article, I'd say it's appropriate to find a source and add the characterization of Mr. R's political leaning. Swliv (talk) 17:25, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

"Citework" & templates[edit]

"Citework" is what I call the grunge work of looking up citations and creating footnotes in the form I understand to be standard. This article has lots of presumably good citations but most, still, are lacking "full form" footnotes. I'll probably chip away at it but I welcome any help; and hope that going forward maybe we can upgrade-as-we-go, eh?

... &, encountering it more and more these days, I'll make my first effort here to address the mega-block of (yes, handsome, but) annoying, impersonal ... "templates" (they're called) up top of this Talk page. I don't think they are welcoming or encouraging to an editor who comes (in person; v. bot?) to the Talk page to talk about the article. They're intrusive in a guilty-until-proven-innocent way. Put them at the bottom of the Talk page? Or in a small "utilities/contents" kind of box to the upper right? Or in an expand-if-you-want long-thin header box? Those are not a bad ideas, off the top of my head. I'm just thinking "aloud" here; it's not my specialty. Any other thoughts? Cheers. Swliv (talk) 17:25, 24 May 2012 (UTC) Swliv (talk) 17:25, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

‘DNAinfo,’ ‘Gothamist’ owner abruptly shutters sites 6 days after staff unionizes[edit]

https://mic.com/articles/185798/dnainfo-gothamist-owner-abruptly-shutters-sites-6-days-after-staff-unionizes#.30kFCUWns

--Wikipietime (talk) 02:16, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Joe Ricketts. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:04, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]