Talk:Johansen CAJO 59

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Johansen CAJO 59 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Denmark Low‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Floats and boats[edit]

Not sure between planing (aviation) redlink and planing (sailing). The latter is analagous but not focused on leaving/regaining the water. Hull cross sectional shapes are very different: flat with boats and deep with floats/hulls. I left it red to point out that we lack (I think) an article on the important aviation subject of flying boat hulls and floats. Wasn't consistent, though, as I should have used step (aviation) or somesuch, rather than step which is just a DAB list and does not even mention floats! Do we have a flying boat/floatplane expert out in the harbour?

BTW, in producing this page I found that we don't have a category:amphibious aircraft, which surprised me. Perhaps it should be a subcat of category:seaplanes and flying boats? Maybe this needs wider discussion (as well as someone who knows how to do subcats; I can do cats, but couldn't see how to place them within another).TSRL (talk) 19:51, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note! Cats have been such an issue in the past that I agree that you should probably take it to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft to discuss first! On the redlink, in looking at it, I thought it was an unlikely stand alone subject but the blue link was the closest I could find. Perhaps this subject is worthy of a paragraph on hull design to be added to Amphibious aircraft? Feel free to change it back to a redlink or to write the article!!! - Ahunt (talk) 11:13, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

When talking about hulls, either boat or flying boat, the term planing means similar things. It's the difference between skipping over the surface and ploughing your way through the water. MOST flying boat hulls or floats will plane, (sometimes known as rising up on the step), at a certain speed in water at a given temperature/density, (some hulls notoriously refused to plane, usually due to bad hydrodynamics and lack of power). The major factor affecting the ability to plane is the "Step" design. It was found early on that floats or hulls tended to stick to the water and a means of breaking this suction was found in the step, which allows air under the sides of the hull bottom, as water speed increases, dramatically reducing the hydrodynamic drag and stiction.Petebutt (talk) 16:28, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]