This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This page is about an active politician who is running for office or has recently run for office, is in office and campaigning for re-election, or is involved in some current political conflict or controversy. Because of this, this article is at increased risk of biased editing, talk-page trolling, and simple vandalism.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cannabis, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cannabis on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CannabisWikipedia:WikiProject CannabisTemplate:WikiProject CannabisCannabis articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject University of Florida, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.University of FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject University of FloridaTemplate:WikiProject University of FloridaUniversity of Florida articles
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
This article had no citations whatsoever for birth name, birth date, birthplace, children, education and other personal-life claims, in violation of WP:BLP, one of Wikipedia's most stringent policies. Do not make such claims without strict WP:RScitations. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:33, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Unexplained removal of the constructive edits[edit]
Hello, Marquardtika! I totally understand your concerns about COI but I have no conflict of interest in editing this particular page and I’m just a common editor as you are. I’ve been improving several pages recently and John Morgan is just one of them. My concern is that you deleted all my edits at once, so I hope you have no conflict of interest as well to discuss the updating of this page.
As a matter of fact, I started working on the page in my sandbox because I found it very far from being encyclopedic. For your reference, please, check this link, so you can easily compare my work and the current state of the page:
Now, I’d like to detail what I actually did and why. What triggered my attention is that the page doesn’t reflect the person’s biography in full and many sections contain information chaotically. In my opinion, the current page looks more like a tabloid article than an encyclopedic one. So, here what I did to improve the page:
I included initiatives of legalizing medical marijuana in 2016 and minimum per hour wage of $15 by 2026 (also known as 2020 Florida Amendment 2. This information is very well referenced and important to include as we are talking about the actions on the state or regional level with the impact on more than 20 million people. Actually, I think this is the most important thing, the lawyer has done until now.
I expanded the lawyer’s biography section based on reliable sources
I moved irrelevant information from the career to Politics section to separate the lawyer’s legal career and his political activity. I also added «Early beginnings subsection and detailed on the major milestones of the company, detailing on the information about beginning of mass advertising, partners etc. I also balanced the controversial text relying on the same sources to make it more neutral and readable encyclopedically. Finally, I listed information on some notable cases with good references.
Politics section consists the information currently found in the History with some additions.
Civil rights initiative and charitable causes is an important section because it is mostly about legal initiatives where John Morgan took a notable part and did a lot of contributions.
Criticism. I didn't remove any criticism but added more information from the same sources. Writing about "dick jokes" without adding some relevant info is clearly not the best examples of biography writing and might potentially violate WP: BLP.
I had been working on improvement of the articles in my sandbox for almost two weeks and did a serious research, I’d appreciate if you can spend some time to discuss your concerns in detail here on the talk page. All the information in my updates is very well referenced and verifiable. Please, share what looked promotional or non-neutral in my writing. Also, since you removed all of my edits at once, I’m inclined to ask for the second opinion from other editors, in particular from Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. --Evilfreethinker (talk) 10:18, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}