Talk:John P. Craven

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WP:MILHIST Assessment[edit]

This is a decent article for length and detail. But on organization and writing style, I must say I feel like it sounds more like an "About the Author" than an encylopedia article. Craven's academic qualifications do not belong in the introduction, as they do not summarize who he is or why he is historically/academically significant. With just a bit of reorganization and copy-editing for encyclopedic (academic) writing style, this can quickly become a very solid article, perhaps even B-class. LordAmeth 00:06, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Needs Ballard relation[edit]

Needs relation with Robert Ballard. 70.36.176.224 (talk) 07:19, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ballard's article needs to talk more about Craven. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.191.143.44 (talk) 14:56, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on John P. Craven. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:56, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]