Talk:John Ratzenberger/Archives/2013

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Aussie mayor?

What's up with this "close personal friend" of a mayor in Australia? How did it come about, and how did the mayor serve as inspiration for the Cliff character? It isn't anywhere that I can see on Google but this article. It reads like a joke on Gillis. --Dhartung | Talk 07:02, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Frasier

I have changed the information about Frasier to be accurate within my knowledge. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.71.96.23 (talkcontribs)

That's OK, the information was unsourced anyway. --Dhartung | Talk 00:02, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Toy Story 3

There is a contradiction between a sentence here and one in the article of Toy Story 3 regarding the attitudes of Tom Hanks and Tim Allen. The Toy Story 3 atricle states:

This turn of events was not greeted with enthusiasm by all, with Pixar regular John Ratzenberger going so far as to say he would not be involved without Pixar.[citation needed] Others, such as Tim Allen, the voice of Buzz Lightyear, indicated a willingness to return even if Pixar was not on board.

Whereas the John Ratzenberger article says:

It is presumable that he will indeed be cast, as Tom Hanks and Tim Allen had previously adopted this stance, but have since been confirmed as part of the cast since Pixar took over production.

Unable to find the correct information myself, just thought it needed pointing out. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.68.1.149 (talk) 12:28, 22 April 2007 (UTC).

Fair use rationale for Image:Brenderlin.jpg

Image:Brenderlin.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:37, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Pixar roles

Deleted the references to Ratzenberger appearing in upcoming Pixar features, because we don't actually know if he'll be in them or not. Vidor (talk) 06:50, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

Added citation needed to being Pixar's "Good Luck Charm." Has anybody from Pixar actually been quoted as saying that? I know he's in all the Pixar movies and the media calls him the good luck charm but it seems it should actually come from Pixar to be included here. Cubbieco (talk) 18:37, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

What I'm curious about is why Ratzenberger has been in all of Pixar's feature films. Is there a source anywhere that indicates his casting? I know the Pixar-related section suggests that he is friends with a director, but it is offhandedly mentioned. I think the reasoning behind his consistent casting would be of interest to any readers of this article. Jackal Killer (talk) 12:24, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
The citation is on the List of Pixar film references page. SpikeJones (talk) 13:43, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
The citation is all good and well, but Lasseter considering Ratzenberger "Pixar's good luck charm" is mentioned nowhere on this page, just in that citation. It would be informative to rework the section to include that citation, but even then I don't see how it would be entirely helpful.
Pixar cast Ratzenberger for Toy Story, then A Bug's Life. At what point was he considered their "lucky charm"? I can understand that after three or four hits that would be the consensus, but Pixar would have had to hire him for some particular reason those first two or three times to get anywhere near that conclusion. With one or two hits you can't conclude that a sole voice actor is the cause of your good fortune. It seems likely that there was an original reason for casting Ratzenberger which later on evolved into the "good luck" belief. Though I do admit maybe they just liked him. Jackal Killer (talk) 14:21, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
I know John Lasseter called him Pixar's good louck charm in the publicity material they were releaseing on the Cars website prior to the movies release. He pointed out that Ratzenberger had had at least a cameo role in every Pixar movie from Toy Story on at that point and that all the Pixar movies to that point had been #1 on opening weekend. -annonymous 6/25/2012 6:18 AM EST

Kung Fu Panda 2 Isn't A Pixar Film (It's Dreamworks)... That should be moved from the section under Pixar Roles... to somewhere else.. just a heads up —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.160.146.57 (talk) 03:06, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

picture

this page needs a new picture of john ratzenberger hornplayer2 (talk) 04:05, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

How Successful?

"the 4th most successful actor of all time, as measured by a total box office of over $3,000,000,000."

Seems a pretty limited way of measuring an actor's success. Do talent, skill, popularity, count for nothing? I could list several hundred actors who I'm sure would be generally considered to be more successful, y'know, Marlon Brando, Meryl Streep, Sir Lawrence Olivier, Jack Nicolson..... 92.234.49.13 (talk) 17:45, 30 May 2011 (UTC)