This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Anthroponymy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the study of people's names on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthroponymyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthroponymyTemplate:WikiProject AnthroponymyAnthroponymy articles
This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved -- JHunterJ (talk) 12:30, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe so. Looking over the current list, it's perhaps not an uncommon surname in Commonwealth realms (I haven't heard it in the US, but it's probably happened). But if there were other notable John Wilmots, where are there articles? Right now, we appear to have six politicians with fairly unremarkable careers (and the pageviews to match) against a poet who continues to be studied over three centuries after his death. He's not Shakespeare, he's not Pushkin, but in addition to the pageviews, he meets the PTOPIC criterion of long-term significance: "has substantially greater enduring notability and educational value than any other topic associated with that term." In the first two pages, I see only three results not related to the Restoration poet: a LinkedIn profile, a Facebook profile, and an actor. --BDD (talk) 18:05, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support move: the poet appears to be primary topic, so the base name should redirect to him. PamD 18:54, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above. bd2412T 21:33, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.