Talk:Jonathan Rosenblatt

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

WP:BIO: A person is presumed to be notable if he or she has been the subject of published[3] secondary source material which is reliable, intellectually independent,[4] and independent of the subject.[5]"Historicist (talk) 16:52, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also, USER:Ccwaters ought to notify editors of recent articles when adding a deletion tag, and give some justification for deletion.Historicist (talk) 16:52, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
[3]=WP:SINGLEEVENT, [4]:=WP:BIO next bullet after your quote:"if the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources may be needed to prove notability; trivial coverage of a subject by secondary sources may not be sufficient to establish notability." [5] I can't comment on that, don't have the printed material at hand.
I came across this when you listed him as a notable John Hopkins alumnus (I think?). Honestly, from the outside, he looks like any other rabbi. What's sets him apart? I admit: this is my not an area I'm familiar with. If you get a couple members of Wikipedia:WikiProject Judaism to come over and say he's notable I'll move on, otherwise I'll AFD.
FYI: There's no requirement that I notify you. I have no reason why I didn't, I just didn't. I'll extend that courtesy to you in the future if and when I AFD this. ccwaters (talk) 18:52, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting source -- saunas, etc.[edit]

Today's New York Times: [1]. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 15:55, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jonathan Rosenblatt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:09, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]