Talk:Journey of Bhangover

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Cinema Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film reviews[edit]

I noticed this movie a short while ago at Prime Video: [1]. It seemed of dubious notability at first glance. So I searched for its reviews. And I could find just three (shortish) reviews, out of which at least one might be unreliable:

Noorani, Reza (29 March 2018). "JOURNEY OF BHANGOVER MOVIE REVIEW". The Times of India. Archived from the original on 12 August 2020. Retrieved 12 August 2020.
Thomas, Johnson (15 December 2017). "Journey of Bhangover: Review, Cast, Story, Director". The Free Press Journal. Archived from the original on 12 August 2020. Retrieved 12 August 2020.
Srivastava, Abhishek (15 December 2017). "Review: हंसी का हैंगओवर है 'जर्नी ऑफ भांगओवर'" [Review: 'Journey of Bhangover' is a hangover of laughter]. Firstpost (in Hindi). Archived from the original on 12 August 2020. Retrieved 12 August 2020.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)

I want to add them under the Further reading section, but I am not sure if all of them are suitable for that purpose, e.g. one of them is in Hindi and the other one is published by a dubious-looking newspaper.

So here are a few questions:

Is The Free Press Journal considered reliable for the Bollywood film reviews? BTW, there seems to be no mention of it at WP:ICTFSOURCES.
Can one provide non-English sources under the Further reading section of an article?
On a minor note, the title of the TOI article is in capitals. So, should we mention it in capitals in the citation? I mean, should we provide the title as "JOURNEY OF BHANGOVER MOVIE REVIEW" or as "Journey Of Bhangover Movie Review" in the citation? BTW, {{Template:Cite news}} states the following regarding the Source title: "The title of the article as it appears in the source". So I guess it should be in capitals, but I am unsure about it.

I am hardly familiar with sourcing standards of Bollywood film articles. But Cyphoidbomb seems to be well-versed in this area. So he might answer the above questions.

PS: This article was created by Bazzaka to probably promote Prerika Arora (see its revision history). - NitinMlk (talk) 21:34, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@NitinMlk: Hey there, sorry for the delay. 1) I think FPJ should be sufficient. It's been around for almost a hundred years, from what I saw in its Wikipedia article. 2) I don't see why we couldn't use non-English sources in the Further reading section. Since you're also noting that it's in Hindi, that pretty much satisfies any suggestion I would have made about it. 3) I would not do all caps for the title. We're allowed to modify even direct quotations for minor things like grammar/punctuation/typography (per MOS:CONFORM) so I would hope we'd be allowed to do normal title case. Hope that helps, and questions are always appreciated. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:21, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cyphoidbomb, thanks for the clarification. I have added them under the "Further reading" section. - NitinMlk (talk) 17:33, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]