Talk:Julius Waties Waring

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merger proposal[edit]

I propose that J. Waites Waring be merged into Julius Waties Waring. I think that the content in the J. Waites Waring article can easily be explained in the context of Julius Waties Waring, and the J. Waites Waring article is of a reasonable size in which the merging of Julius Waties Waring will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned.Alanl (talk) 15:31, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree the articles should merge, but I would preserve J. Waties Waring as the resulting article, because that's the name he's better known by. Also to my recollection: (1) he did not die in office as he had retired some years earlier and (2) I think it's a stretch to say he was an advocate of civil rights early in his career; at most, he was a moderate. It was not until about 1945 or so that he really became outspoken on racial issues. Again this is just my general recollection, I don't have access to the Kluger or Yarborough books that would elucidate these points.Groovemeister007 (talk) 18:27, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Julius Waties Waring. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:57, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]