Talk:Jung Dae-hyun

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Himchan which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 21:29, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Jung Dae-hyun. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:57, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Controversial information in the solo career section[edit]

In the solo career section, a "controversy" about the cost of a crowdfunding project is described. I believe that this information shouldn't be included because it comes from an online article of a journalist's personal opinion. As I understand the personal opinion on assumptions isn't a reliable source. ByBangYG (talk) 00:58, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There are two sources cited, the one particularly critical of Daehyun being the newspaper Munhwa Ilbo. If opinions were written in reliable sources were not acceptable, we could never include album and movie reviews. What assumption is being made here? The journalist deemed it excessive. That's not an assumption. Daehyun even addressed the issue and lamented having to take part in crowdfunding for his album. ℯxplicit 07:16, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


You're writing an article that should be objective based on 2 articles online where they cite opinions without giving names, talk about criticism by Internet users without citing the sources, compare ticket prices that offer different benefits as if they were the same, and they don't clarify that a percentage of money goes to foundations of needy people. An article with incomplete information, that doesn't name its sources, and that it's an isolated opinion can't be a reliable source. On the other hand, You mention that DaeHyun expressed his position on the subject. Please show me the source of his official statement. Finally, what is the purpose of including the comparison between 2 artists? It's assumed that according to that article the fans reacted positively to Bang for being authentic, however the project exceeded its goal by almost 400%. So the previous statement has no support. What is the purpose of including this type of information? ByBangYG (talk) 21:06, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have a core misunderstanding of what constitutes a reliable source, and I suggest you read WP:RS to familiarize yourself. Minority opinions are not disqualified, especially simply because don't like what it says. He stated his position on crowdfunding (which he doesn't like) and expressed sympathy to his fans for putting them in a position to contribute to it (but had to because he has no company backing him) in this interview with with Kyunghyang Shinmun. The crowdfunding project was successful, that much is obvious since he was able to release his mini-album. He was also criticized for the excessive amount of contributions relative to the benefits. As this article states, the benefits for contributing ₩500,000 is being able to go to his concert when, according to this article, concert tickets generally cost ₩100,000 – ₩150,000. The other source, Munhwa Ilbo compares and contrasts them because they are former bandmates, and the journalist viewed one positively and the other negatively. I'm not sure where you're getting the idea that he was criticized by netizens, nothing like that is written on the page. ℯxplicit 12:50, 16 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Jung_Dae-hyun&oldid=1207878911"