Talk:Junkers A50

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

5000?[edit]

Do we have a citeable source for this sales target? Was he serious? It's about the number of ju52/3ms shifted by the nationalised factory in the war, but far more than any Junkers machine at the time, even his very successful F 13 (300+ sold).TSRL (talk) 22:55, 2 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Portugal[edit]

There is displayed a Portuguese flag, but there are no A50s listed in GoldenYears civil lists for that country. Does anyone have any positive info on them?TSRL (talk) 19:40, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Junkers A 50 at Junkers.de mentions Portugal: "Zu den Exportländern gehörten Japan, Südafrika, Australien, Brasilien, Portugal, Finnland sowie die Schweiz. ". Martin.bergner (talk) 22:04, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can we have a few more citations, particularly those above, to make a nice B-class article?Petebutt (talk) 22:50, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Junkers A50. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120219070818/http://www.goldenyears.ukf.net/ to http://www.goldenyears.ukf.net/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:30, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]