Talk:Jurney v. MacCracken

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

U.S. Supreme Court cases

	This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Sen. Leahy???[edit]

Senator Patrick J. Leahy, the current (2014) senator from Vermont, was born five years after the events discussed in the page for which the reference "This is the Statement of SEN. Patrick J. Leahy, Ranking Minority Member, before the Senate Judiciary Committee" is provided. Further, the link itself, which contains the tag "" is broken, so the fact that there is EXACTLY zero context about why anyone would care in any way what Sen. Leahy had to say about the case there is also no hope of following the link to try to intuit what the editor had in mind. So I'm removing it and I suggest that the person who put it here, should they want to add it back, find a link that works and add the context/explanation about why anything Sen. Leahy might have said 70+ years after the fact could possibly be of interest to this particular page.157.185.95.28 (talk) 16:20, 8 May 2014 (UTC)mjd[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Jurney v. MacCracken. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080421135250/http://www.ecommcode2.com/hoover/research/historicalmaterials/other/maccrack.htm to http://www.ecommcode2.com/hoover/research/historicalmaterials/other/maccrack.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:03, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]