Talk:KELO-TV

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

CLEANUP![edit]

This page needs alot of cleanup and grammical errors corrected!

[edit]

the logo for keloland is outdated

Fair use rationale for Image:Kelologo.jpg[edit]

Image:Kelologo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 10:40, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Kelo dt2 mntv.PNG[edit]

Image:Kelo dt2 mntv.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Kelo dt2 upn.PNG[edit]

Image:Kelo dt2 upn.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 23:43, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adding unreferenced entries of former employees to lists containing BLP material[edit]

Hello, Please do not add unreferenced names as entries to the list of former employees in articles. Including this type of material in articles does not abide by current consensus and its inclusion is strongly discouraged in our policies and guidelines. The rationales are as follows:

  1. WP:NOT tells us, Wikipedia is "not an indiscriminate collection of information." As that section describes, just because something is true, doesn't necessarily mean the info belongs in Wikipedia.
  2. As per WP:V, we cannot include information in Wikipedia that is not verifiable and sourced.
  3. WP:Source list tells us that lists included within articles (including people's names) are subject to the same need for references as any other information in the article.
  4. Per WP:BLP, we have to be especially careful about including un-sourced info about living persons.

If you look at articles about companies in general, you will not find mention of previous employees, except in those cases where the employee was particularly notable. Even then, the information is not presented just as a list of names, but is incorporated into the text itself (for example, when a company's article talks about the policies a previous CEO had, or when they mention the discovery/invention of a former engineer/researcher). If a preexisting article is already in the encyclopedia for the person you want to add to a list, it's generally regarded as sufficient to support their inclusion in list material in another article. cheers Deconstructhis (talk) 02:30, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KELO-TV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:58, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on KELO-TV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:29, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Split out into KCLO-TV[edit]

An additional article needs to be split out into another article titled KCLO-TV (CentralTime301). —Preceding undated comment added 20:35, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The new logo is located here: https://media.keloland.com/nxs-kelotv-media-us-east-1/branding/KELOLANDMediaGroup.png I don't have permissionsMgcolton (talk) 01:19, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review[edit]

GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:KELO-TV/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Vaticidalprophet (talk · contribs) 13:26, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just a few notes here:

  • KELO-TV and its satellites perfectly matched the flow of goods through South Dakota, which centered on Sioux Falls -- clarity? From the second half of the sentence I'm reading this as something like "it was a popular station because Sioux Falls was a manufacturing hub", but I can't see how that follows.
    • More like it was a match to the needs of advertisers.
  • Might be worth contextualizing in "Young Broadcasting ownership" how common/uncommon digital TV access was at the time.
    • Good thought.
  • UTV is not broadcast in Rapid City, where Rapid-owned KKRA-LP was the MyNetworkTV affiliate -- tense of this sentence is confused
    • Reworded.
  • Has anything more come out about the MG/Nexstar ownership in the past 6-10 years?
    • Not...really.
  • The news programs grew more sophisticated and professionalized -- do we have a timeline for this?
    • Reworded to be less puffy.
  • It's worth (dup)linking KSFY and KDLT in the newscasts section, given it's disproportionately likely readers interested in that section will want to compare their coverage.
    • Done
  • Can we give a timeframe on the switch from SD to HD?
    • Done (HD transition of news tends to take up way too much of news sections in articles like this)
  • It might be more natural/less choppy to describe the history of the station's programs (introducing morning programs, afternoon programs, etc) in a dedicated paragraph rather than across separate sparse lines.
    • Done. Now with another ref which will help.
  • KELO-TV additionally rebroadcasts -- no need for 'additionally'
    • Done

Vaticidalprophet 13:26, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Vaticidalprophet: Responded. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 18:20, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All good. I was wondering if actual statistics existed on how many people had digital-compatible devices at that point, but a Google Scholar search was only semi-helpful. Happy to pass this. Vaticidalprophet 18:21, 4 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Lightburst (talk) 21:02, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(
)

Improved to Good Article status by Sammi Brie (talk). Self-nominated at 00:59, 5 August 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/KELO-TV; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

  • Recently promoted at GA, review looks good and I don't see any additional issues with the article content. I like the hook, it's fun, and cited appropriately. QPQ done, so we're good to go here. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 04:16, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:KELO-TV&oldid=1203239217"