This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hong Kong, a project to coordinate efforts in improving all Hong Kong-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Hong Kong-related articles, you are invited to join this project.Hong KongWikipedia:WikiProject Hong KongTemplate:WikiProject Hong KongHong Kong articles
This article is written in Hong Kong English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, travelled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
It is too long, look likes a original research and totally lack of citation. the site formation contract was award on 24 November 2009 and Legislative Council, Hong Kong passed the funding on 20 November 2009, for a sum of 2.339 billion HKD (sum of installments, construction is pay in installments subject to construction progress, so it is NOT a present value at November 2009 time nor PV at completion date). Matthew_hktc 18:30, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I reverted the article back a few days because I'm concerned about many of the recent edits: they seem to have been converting the article into more of an advertisment/press release. User:Ktct, are you connected with the subject of the article by any chance? (If so, you should disclose that, especially if you're being paid to update the article.) In any case, you should try reading up on what encyclopaedic style is about; and note that good sources (especially links to reliable secondary sources that cover the article's subject from an outside point of view) are going to be much more useful than lists of unsourced information. (Imagine if someone decided to change details in what you'd written. Nobody would have a way to tell which version was correct.) --ais523 09:50, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
