This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. No evidence that this subject is the primary topic. Jenks24 (talk) 18:16, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Aqualad (Kaldur'ahm) → Aqualad – Currently, the Aqualad article is a pseudo-dab page for the two Aqualad characters. I find it unnecessary per WP:TWODABS. We can move Kaldur to his most common name at "Aqualad" and a hatnote should suffice in redirecting to Garth (comics). I would've suggested a merger, but everything in the pseudo-dab page is forked in the other articles. Feedback 16:09, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose obviously since there are two, removing the identification of the this article isn't going to help. The main article shows DC Comics use of the franchise name, chances are they'll reuse it for a third character at some point, and even if they don't serves the purpose now. In ictu oculi (talk) 06:34, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. No reason is given why the later Aqualad is more notable and worthy of WP:PRIMARYTOPIC status than the first, which is a requirement if WP:TWODABS is to apply. There may an argument that Aqualad should be changed from the present WP:CONCEPTDAB to a straight disambig page with two entries - I'm not sure if the two Aqualads are connected with each other in any way. — Amakuru (talk) 12:34, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
