Talk:Kampfgeschwader 76

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Kampfgeschwader 76 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Military history: Aviation / European / German / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

Removal of maintenance template[edit]

I restored the tag {{refimprove|date=October 2016}} as the issues has not been addressed. Please let me know if there are any concerns. K.e.coffman (talk) 05:46, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I restored the template, again. The article contains 11 paragraphs, 9 of which are uncited. The reverting editor states that ""article mostly covered. unnecessary" but I don't see how. K.e.coffman (talk) 18:52, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Second removal of maintenance templates[edit]

Maintenance templates should not be removed diff until the issue is addressed. Please see:

K.e.coffman (talk) 18:46, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit[edit]

I partially reverted recent edits diff. The reason to do this was to remove the uncited material that has previously been challenged.

The recent editing has made it difficult to separate content building edits from restoration of the uncited material and removal of maintenance tag. The first edit restored uncited material and removed the maintenance tags: diff. (By the way "reverted back to my last edit" is not a sufficient justification to a revert and brings to mind WP:OWN).

Subsequent edits (diff) provided some citations, but did not restore the tag and did not remove the uncited material either.

I've done my best to separate the two, and bring back a more acceptable version of the article, with the maintenance tags. Please also see above for two notices about the removal of the maint tag. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You need to do better than that. Explain how that implies ownership. Dapi89 (talk) 19:26, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How should I be interpreting the edit summary "reverted back to my last edit"? Please help me understand. K.e.coffman (talk) 22:17, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As precisely that. Dapi89 (talk) 19:36, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Bditelnyy(7)01.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:39, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]