Talk:Karaka (tree)

New Zealand Mid‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Plants Mid‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dangerously misleading[edit]

Argh! Ok, this is dangerously misleading: "If soaked in salt water, boiled or roasted, the seeds become edible." If someone tried just roasting them, they'd kill themselves. Or perhaps I exaggerate, they might just get muscle contractions bad enough to break their own bones, or tear their own muscles if they didn't get medical treatment fast enough. You really wouldn't need to eat much. If they're soaked, and boiled then roasted - yeah, they might be ok, but it's a very long process. Ummm. Reference, here: http://www.geocities.com/rainforest/7109/karaka.htm Or in... books. Lots of books. Or by googling karaka poisoning and getting lovely old historical accounts: http://rsnz.natlib.govt.nz/volume/rsnz_04/rsnz_04_00_002360.html

Just. I'd hate for someone to read the above line and think that they're only poisonous like acorns (ie, you soak them to get the bitter-tannin out, which is a magnitude less poisonous than karakin), and try boiling them up or something. o_O

- A. Nonymous, Wellington, New Zealand —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.154.238.36 (talk) 08:21, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're right, it was dangerously misleading. Rewritten somewhat, and a link to a 19th century source with a vivid description of the symptoms of poisoning. Kahuroa 09:47, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unverified[edit]

The sentence "In modern-day New Zealand, no part of the plant or its fruit is eaten." is not correct. I can only offer anecdotal evidence to the contrary, but would suggest that this statement either needs to be verified or removed? Te Irirangi (talk) 06:30, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough, done. Kahuroa (talk) 07:14, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Karakin[edit]

The description as an alkaloid is correct only in the very broadest sense: karakin does contain nitrogen atoms, but in nitro rather than amine form. It's some number of molecules of 3-nitropropanoic acid, the actual toxin, with an ester linkage to a glucose molecule. This might be more useful information in a page on karakin, admittedly.

The most complete information I have is from an MSc thesis but there are other published sources with fewer details. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tslumley (talk • contribs) 04:47, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]