Talk:Karl James Jalkanen

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Notability[edit]

Stone: His peer reviewed scientific papers have been cited over 1,500 times, and over 175 just last year. Is this notability enough? See: http://www.researcherid.com/rid/A-2456-2008 Jonverve (talk) 18:04, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is there any article about him? Best would be somebody calling him a notable scientist.--Stone (talk) 04:40, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How about this? Jonverve (talk) 04:57, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And also as a Fellow of the Royal Society of Physics, the qualifications are "FRSC: Fellow of the Royal Society of Chemistry Fellowship may be awarded to nominees who have made an outstanding contribution to chemistry." Jonverve (talk) 05:08, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good enough! --Stone (talk) 06:17, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]