Talk:Karl Teichmann

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Military history: Aviation / Biography / European / World War I

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military biography task force
	European military history task force
	World War I task force

Aviation: Biography

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aerospace biography project.

MILHIST[edit]

This is a Start-class article. I think, if B3 was yes and B1 or B2 was a no, then you'd get a C-class for WP:MILHIST. Adamdaley (talk) 11:03, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's a fair assessment because the text is scanty...though I never have been comfortable with C Class. If you wish to jigger the templates into Start class, I shan't object. And many thanks for the assessment.Georgejdorner (talk) 21:09, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Victory credits[edit]

Is he really an ace? Not unless there is some source for the method Austria-Hungary used for crediting "shared" victories. Under systems I am familiar with, he would be credited with 3.83 victories. .33 credit for the 26 September victory and .5 credit for the 27 November victory. --Lineagegeek (talk) 23:15, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Per Aerial victory standards of World War I#Austria-Hungary, he was an ace. There were no fractional victories awarded by anyone in WWI. You have apparently applied some self-concocted counting system. Or are you trying to use WWII standards that had not yet been invented during WWI?Georgejdorner (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"self-concocted"! Learn some manners. Whether it is 3.83 or 5 there is no basis for notability in this article. Shooting down 5 e/a does not confer notability by itself, and there's not much else to see in this article. --Lineagegeek (talk) 00:10, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My manners include giving sources for my assertions. Why don't yours? If you make unproven assertions, you lead people (like me) to think you are concocting them. And if you had checked MilHist notability, you would have found out that acedom confers notability. Again, how about a source for fractional victory counts during WWI?Georgejdorner (talk) 23:20, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As I have said, even 5 victories does not confer notability. Since you appear dedicated into turning this into a conflict, and make much about "concocting" ideas, please provide your source for your assertion that "acedom confers notability." There is no WP:MILHIST guideline for personal notability. Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Notability guide#People. The revoked guideline is available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Historical SOLDIER essay, but it does not include acedom.--Lineagegeek (talk) 20:05, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Opinions without sources for proof are worthless. You have yet to list a source for any of your opinions. End of conversation.Georgejdorner (talk) 22:54, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]