Talk:Karma in Jainism/GA2

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Redtigerxyz (talk · contribs) 11:34, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	^{[citation needed]} added.
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Can "The karmic inflow on account of yogadriven by passions and emotions cause a long term inflow of karma prolonging the cycle of reincarnation and transmigration of a soul." be simplified? How it relates to the image?Redtigerxyz ^Talk 11:43, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
	7. Overall assessment.

I have changed the caption of the image. Rahul Jain (talk) 15:05, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is yoga in "Attraction and binding" same as that in "Causes of attraction and bondage" ? Seems like that. Link on first instance. No explanation is needed again.

Apart from this small points, every thing looks ok. Redtigerxyz ^Talk 06:31, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Few more problems:

http://www.goodreads.com/ doesn't seem reliable.
Kirtivijay, Kalghatgi etc. missing ISBN
Isn't 47 and 77 same ref? Add specific page number.
Translation of Samaṇ Suttaṁ: original lang. of text, translated into (English?), does it have a commentary ? Redtigerxyz ^Talk 06:58, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am unable to find suitable solutions to these problems. Rahul Jain (talk) 17:54, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Addressed the remaining above concerns myself, so this review can now be closed. Wizardman 22:30, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]