Talk:Katie Hopkins

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeKatie Hopkins was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 16, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
June 20, 2007WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
July 13, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
July 20, 2007Articles for deletionKept
June 8, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
July 4, 2013Articles for deletionSpeedily kept
Current status: Former good article nominee

Attempted Beheading[edit]

Mrs. Hopkins was the target of terrorist attack where a woman requested her head as a wedding present from her husband. The incident drew media coverage and is deserving of inclusion in there article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.115.4.205 (talk) 05:47, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I agree, nobody deserves that, no matter who they are. 86.147.167.50 (talk) 01:08, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Her anti-obesity activism[edit]

Whilst her anti-obesity views are controversial, she should be included in the category "Anti-obesity activists" since she could definitely be considered one, considering she did an entire TV show encouraging people to lose weight and was very vocal about it too. She's known for her anti-obesity views and activism. 86.147.167.50 (talk) 01:08, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 10 June 2023[edit]

She is not “far right”. Just right wing. Far right is someone like Adolph Hitler 2A02:C7C:BF08:9000:E45B:1EB7:9FA6:67EB (talk) 10:01, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: Wikipedia does not publish the opinions of its editors. The label is based on reporting in reliable sources, many of which are provided in the inline citation right after the label. Actualcpscm (talk) 11:06, 10 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Citation[edit]

How can the "Index of Births, Marriages and Deaths in England and Wales, 1837–1983" (which even if it were correct would constitute original research) be cited for an apparent September 2004 marriage? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.24.233.100 (talk) 04:42, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]